Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews
- PMID: 39258215
- PMCID: PMC11386270
- DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1433
Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews
Abstract
This guide outlines general issues in searching for studies; describes the main sources of potential studies; and discusses how to plan the search process, design, and carry out search strategies, manage references found during the search process and document and report the search process.
Keywords: search; systematic reviews.
© 2024 The Author(s). Campbell Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Campbell Collaboration.
References
-
- Aamodt, M. , Huurdeman, H. , & Strømme, H. (2019). Librarian co‐authored systematic reviews are associated with lower risk of bias compared to systematic reviews with acknowledgement of librarians or no participation by librarians. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 14(4), 103–127. 10.18438/eblip29601 - DOI
-
- Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality . (2014). Methods guide for effectiveness and comparative effectiveness reviews: AHRQ publication no. 10(14)‐EHC063‐EF. http://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/ehc/products/60/318/CER-Methods-Guid... - PubMed
-
- Alshami, A. , Elsayed, M. , Ali, E. , Eltoukhy, A. E. E. , & Zayed, T. (2023). Harnessing the power of ChatGPT for automating systematic review process: Methodology, case study, limitations, and future directions. Systems, 11(7), 351. 10.3390/systems11070351 - DOI
-
- Aromataris, E. , Lockwood, C. , Porritt, K. , Pilla, B. , & Jordan, Z. (Eds.). (2024). JBI manual for evidence synthesis. JBI. https://synthesismanual.jbi.global
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources