Split-Dose Cisplatin in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 39260094
- DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102176
Split-Dose Cisplatin in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Background: Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) is a highly active and commonly used regimen in locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC). With GC, cisplatin is dosed at 70 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 3-week cycle; however, for many patients, impaired renal or cardiac function, neuropathy, or poor performance status (PS) can preclude the use of cisplatin. A promising alternative is split-dose GC, in which the cisplatin dose is divided over 2 days.
Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) and network meta-analysis (NMA) to better understand treatment patterns and comparative effectiveness and safety of split-dose GC vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin (GCa), GC, and methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC).
Results: Among 120 identified studies, 16 studies representing 1,767 patients included split-dose GC. Common reasons for choosing split-dose GC were impaired renal function, age > 70 years, comorbidities, and physician preference. Split-dose GC had objective response rates (ORRs) of 39%-80%, median progression-free survival (PFS) of 3.5-9.9 months, and median overall survival (OS) of 8.5-18.1 months. Discontinuation rates due to adverse events were 5%-38%. In the NMA, ORR with split-dose GC was significantly higher than with GCa. PFS and OS for split-dose GC were similar to that observed with the other regimens (GCa, GC, and MVAC).
Conclusions: This is the first SLR and NMA of split-dose GC in la/mUC. Despite heterogeneity in the limited studies included, split-dose GC demonstrated comparable effectiveness and safety profile to those seen with other regimens. Split-dose GC thus has the potential to extend the la/mUC population eligible to receive cisplatin-based regimens and warrants further prospective study.
Keywords: Chemotherapy; Dosing; Metastatic urothelial cancer; Platinum; Survival.
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure Richard O'Dwyer has received support for travel and attending meetings from Pfizer and research funding from the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. Mihaela G. Musat and Hoora Moradian are employees of Cytel, which was contracted for this work by the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. Ioana Gulas and Elizabeth Hubscher were employees of Cytel at the time of the study. Silke Guenther was an employee of the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, at the time of the study. Mairead Kearney is an employee of the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. Srikala S. Sridhar has served in consulting or advisory roles for Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Merck & Co, Kenilworth, NJ, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, and Seagen and has received institutional research funding from the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
