Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov;33(4):772-777.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2024.08.011. Epub 2024 Aug 27.

Silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings to prevent hospital-acquired sacrum pressure ulcers: An economic evaluation based on a publicly funded pragmatic randomized controlled trial linked with real-world data

Affiliations
Free article

Silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings to prevent hospital-acquired sacrum pressure ulcers: An economic evaluation based on a publicly funded pragmatic randomized controlled trial linked with real-world data

Mattias Neyt et al. J Tissue Viability. 2024 Nov.
Free article

Abstract

Objectives: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of sacrum multilayer silicone foam dressings as an adjuvant prophylactic therapy compared to standard pressure ulcer prevention in a hospital population at high risk for pressure ulcer development.

Methods: An economic evaluation is performed from a healthcare payer's perspective. This evaluation is based on a Belgian publicly funded pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT), linked with real-world data from administrative claims database and a Belgian cost analysis. A cost-consequences analysis with a one-year time horizon is performed.

Results: The RCT has shown that the risk of developing a new pressure ulcer on the sacrum was statistically significantly reduced by 41 % in the treatment group (RR = 0.59, 95 % CI 0.35-0.98, p = 0.04). The absolute risk reduction of 2.0 % (95 % CI -0.1-4.1 %) coincides with a number needed to treat of 50.0 to prevent one new pressure ulcer of category II or worse. The evolution of quality of life is on average negative for patients who developed a pressure ulcer before day 3, while it is positive for patients without pressure ulcers. In a scenario with conservative assumptions, i.e. without inclusion of price discounts for the multilayer silicone foam dressings and only including costs during the hospitalization, pressure ulcer prevention with dressings on the sacrum was already cost-neutral.

Conclusions: The preventive use of silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings on the sacrum for a population similar to the pragmatic trial population can be supported both from a clinical and economic point of view.

Keywords: Biomedical; Cost-benefit analysis; Pressure ulcer; Prevention and control; Technology assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest MN, CDM, SD and EM are members of the KCE Expert Team. KCE is a federal institution. KCE's mission is to advise policymakers on decisions relating to health care and health insurance on the basis of scientific and objective research. KCE has no interest in companies (commercial or non-commercial, i.e. hospitals and universities), associations (e.g. professional associations, unions), individuals or organisations (e.g. lobby groups) that could be positively or negatively affected (financially or in any other way) by the implementation of the recommendations. MN, CDM, SD and EM have no relevant interests to declare. DB has the following interests to declare: Membership of the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (EPUAP), European Wound Management Association (EWMA), and International Skin Tear Advisory Panel (ISTAP)). Participation in pressure ulcer research (investigator initiated) funded by industry developing prophylactic multi-layer foam dressings. Research grant provided by Mölnlycke Healthcare (Core Outcome Sets in clinical studies on bordered foam dressings). Member of International Wound Dressing Technology Expert Panel (IWDTEP) - Mölnlycke Healthcare. Fees for speaking at scientific meetings by companies in this sector (Mölnlycke Healthcare, Smith & NephewSmith & Nephew, 3M Healthcare, Flen Pharma).

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources