Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Oct;48(10):2400-2412.
doi: 10.1002/wjs.12339. Epub 2024 Sep 11.

Intraoperative wound irrigation to prevent surgical site infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Intraoperative wound irrigation to prevent surgical site infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Kaique Flavio Xavier Cardoso Filardi et al. World J Surg. 2024 Oct.

Abstract

Introduction: The potential benefit of intraoperative wound irrigation (IOWI) in preventing surgical site infection (SSI) remains unclear. The use of antimicrobial agents (AMA) or antiseptic agents (ASA) is controversial worldwide.

Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing AMA or ASA with saline solution in patients who underwent abdominal surgery. Sub-analyses were performed on the type of surgery, type of intervention agent, and wound classification.

Results: Nineteen studies comprising 4915 patients undergoing abdominal surgery were included. SSI was observed in 207 out of 2504 patients in the intervention group (8.26 %) and 344 out of 2411 patients in the control group (14.27%). Overall, intraoperative wound irrigation (IOWI) with AMA or ASA was associated with a lower SSI (Odds ratio (OR) 0.62; 95% CI 0.47, 0.82; p < 0.01; I2 = 50%). Sub-analyses have shown a tendency for decreased SSI in patients from emergency surgery (OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.30, 0.70; p < 0.01; I2 = 23%), patients with contaminated wound (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.31, 0.74; p < 0.01; I2 = 24%), and either the use of AMA or ASA (OR 0.53 vs. 0.65).

Conclusion: The overall use of AMA or ASA before skin closure was associated with decreased SSI. Lower rates of SSI were observed in the subgroup analysis. Furthermore, we must consider the critical heterogeneity of the studies.

Keywords: abdominal surgery; surgical site infection; surgical site irrigation; wound infection; wound irrigation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Calderwood, Michael S., Deverick J. Anderson, Dale W. Bratzler, E. Patchen Dellinger, Sylvia Garcia‐Houchins, Lisa L. Maragakis, A.‐Christine Nyquist, et al. 2023. “Strategies to Prevent Surgical Site Infections in Acute‐Care Hospitals: 2022 Update.” Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 44(5): 695–720. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2023.67.
    1. Ban, K. A., J. P. Minei, C. Laronga, B. G. Harbrecht, E. H. Jensen, D. E. Fry, et al. 2017. “American College of Surgeons and Surgical Infection Society: Surgical Site Infection Guidelines, 2016 Update.” In Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 59–74. Elsevier Inc.
    1. Heal, Clare F., Jennifer L. Banks, Phoebe D. Lepper, Evangelos Kontopantelis, and Mieke L. van Driel. 2016 Nov 7. “Topical Antibiotics for Preventing Surgical Site Infection in Wounds Healing by Primary Intention.” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016(11). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd011426.pub2.
    1. Edmiston, Charles E., Jr, and David J. Leaper. 2016. “Intra‐Operative Surgical Irrigation of the Surgical Incision: What Does the Future Hold—Saline, Antibiotic Agents, or Antiseptic Agents?” Surgical Infections 17(6): 656–664. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2016.158.
    1. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2018. “Global Guidelines for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection.”[Internet].https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK536404/.184.

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources