Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 12;24(1):853.
doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05572-w.

β-glucans, SAM, and GSH fluctuations in barley anther tissue culture conditions affect regenerants' DNA methylation and GPRE

Affiliations

β-glucans, SAM, and GSH fluctuations in barley anther tissue culture conditions affect regenerants' DNA methylation and GPRE

Renata Orłowska et al. BMC Plant Biol. .

Abstract

Background: Microspore embryogenesis is a process that produces doubled haploids in tissue culture environments and is widely used in cereal plants. The efficient production of green regenerants requires stresses that could be sensed at the level of glycolysis, followed by the Krebs cycle and electron transfer chain. The latter can be affected by Cu(II) ion concentration in the induction media acting as cofactors of biochemical reactions, indirectly influencing the production of glutathione (GSH) and S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM) and thereby affecting epigenetic mechanisms involving DNA methylation (demethylation-DM, de novo methylation-DNM). The conclusions mentioned were acquired from research on triticale regenerants, but there is no similar research on barley. In this way, the study looks at how DNM, DM, Cu(II), SAM, GSH, and β-glucan affect the ability of green plant regeneration efficiency (GPRE).

Results: The experiment involved spring barley regenerants obtained through anther culture. Nine variants (trials) of induction media were created by adding copper (CuSO4: 0.1; 5; 10 µM) and silver salts (AgNO3: 0; 10; 60 µM), with varying incubation times for the anthers (21, 28, and 35 days). Changes in DNA methylation were estimated using the DArTseqMet molecular marker method, which also detects cytosine methylation. Phenotype variability in β-glucans, SAM and GSH induced by the nutrient treatments was assessed using tentative assignments based on the Attenuated Total Reflectance-Fourier Transform Infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy. The effectiveness of green plant regeneration ranged from 0.1 to 2.91 plants per 100 plated anthers. The level of demethylation ranged from 7.61 to 32.29, while de novo methylation reached values ranging from 6.83 to 32.27. The paper demonstrates that the samples from specific in vitro conditions (trials) formed tight groups linked to the factors contributing to the two main components responsible for 55.05% of the variance (to the first component DNM, DM, to the second component GSH, β-glucans, Cu(II), GPRE).

Conclusions: We can conclude that in vitro tissue culture conditions affect biochemical levels, DNA methylation changes, and GPRE. Increasing Cu(II) concentration in the IM impacts the metabolism and DNA methylation, elevating GPRE. Thus, changing Cu(II) concentration in the IM is fair to expect to boost GPRE.

Keywords: β-glucans; Anther culture; Barley; DNA methylation; DNA sequence; GSH; Green plant regeneration efficiency; SAM.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The mean (central line) and the standard deviation (ribbon) of the spectra absorbance (bottom) and the absolute values of calculated the 1st derivative (top) collected from the barley leaves of young regenerants derived via androgenesis. The inset presents the spectra and the 1st derivative for region around 2500 cm−1, which can be tentatively assigned to GSH (shaded). The wavenumber ranges corresponding to SAM (1630–1620 cm−1) and β-glucans (990–950 cm-1), are marked grey shaded
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Principal component analysis biplot. Active variables (for explanation see Table 1) are given in red whereas trials are indicated in colored dots
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Classification and regression tree analysis illustrating trials classification
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Standardized characteristics of DM, DNM, SAM, GSH, β-glucans, and GPRE for trials

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zohary D, Hopf M, Weiss E. Domestication of Plants in the old world: the origin and spread of domesticated plants in Southwest Asia, Europe, and the Mediterranean Basin. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
    1. Badea A, Wijekoon C. Benefits of Barley Grain in Animal and Human Diets. In: Aakash Kumar G, editor. Cereal Grains. Rijeka: IntechOpen; 2021. Ch. 5.
    1. Rani H, Bhardwaj RD. Quality attributes for barley malt: “The backbone of beer.” J Food Sci. 2021;86:3322–40. 10.1111/1750-3841.15858 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Balcerek M, Pielech-Przybylska K, Strąk E, Patelski P, Dziekońska U. Comparison of fermentation results and quality of the agricultural distillates obtained by application of commercial amylolytic preparations and cereal malts. Eur Food Res Technol. 2016;242:321–35.10.1007/s00217-015-2542-7 - DOI
    1. Kasha KJ, Subrahmanyam NC, Ali A. Effect of gibberellic acid treatment, and nutrient supply through detached tillers, upon haploid frequency in barley. Theor Appl Genet. 1978;51:169–75. 10.1007/BF00273142 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources