A Systematic Review of the Optimal Management of Pediatric Distal Radius Displacement Fractures: Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Versus Cast Placement
- PMID: 39262549
- PMCID: PMC11390139
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.66696
A Systematic Review of the Optimal Management of Pediatric Distal Radius Displacement Fractures: Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Versus Cast Placement
Abstract
Distal radius fractures are among the most common pediatric injuries, affecting thousands of children each year. These fractures often require clinical intervention to reduce displacement and ensure the proper healing of the growth plate and wrist bone. The primary objective of this comprehensive analysis is to compare the effectiveness of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) versus cast placement in the treatment of pediatric distal radius fractures, with the aim of identifying the optimal treatment approach. Therefore, a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted on pediatric distal radius displacement fractures using extensive database searches from 2000 to 2024 for specific keywords, ensuring transparency and reproducibility. Our findings indicate that higher displacement necessitates ORIF to minimize long-term complications and ensure better functional outcomes for pediatric patients. Rare studies comparing ORIF and cast placement are analyzed, emphasizing the advantages and limitations of each approach. The document concludes that the choice between ORIF and casting depends on factors such as fracture severity, patient's age, and specific characteristics of the injury to ensure optimal outcomes in pediatric distal radius fracture management. In conclusion, our data suggests that ORIF and cast placement each have pros and cons for pediatric distal radius fractures, with the best treatment depending on fracture specifics and patient factors, but neither method is clearly superior for long-term outcomes.
Keywords: cast placement; children; distal radius displacement fractures (drdf); open reduction and internal fixation (orif); pediatric.
Copyright © 2024, Krumbach et al.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Figures
References
-
- Distal radius fracture (wrist fracture) [ Jul; 2024 ]. 2024. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/distal-ra... https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/distal-ra...
-
- Epidemiology of distal radius fractures and factors predicting risk and prognosis. MacIntyre NJ, Dewan N. J Hand Ther. 2016;29:136–145. - PubMed
-
- Displaced fracture of the distal radius in children: factors responsible for redisplacement after closed reduction. Zamzam MM, Khoshhal KI. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:841–843. - PubMed
-
- Displaced distal radius fractures in children: to reduce or not to reduce? To pin or not to pin? Truong WH, Howard AW, Georgiadis AG. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2020;2:77.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous