Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 27:12:1434182.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1434182. eCollection 2024.

Sex differences in mobility recovery after hip fracture: a time series analysis

Affiliations

Sex differences in mobility recovery after hip fracture: a time series analysis

Carl-Philipp Jansen et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: Sex differences are commonly reported for hip fracture incidence rates and recovery. Current knowledge about mobility recovery after hip fracture involves clinical assessments of physical capacity or patient-reported outcomes. Information on mobility performance during daily life is missing but relevant to evaluate patients' recovery. Hence, it remains unclear whether sex differences exist in the longitudinal progression of mobility performance in hip fracture patients. To investigate this, we pooled data from four studies in Germany and Norway.

Methods: In all studies, real-world mobility was assessed continuously over 1 to 7 days using a sensor fixed to the unaffected frontal thigh. All studies assessed mobility at different time points that were allocated to three distinct phases: Acute and post-acute phase (week 1-6), extended recovery (7-26), and long-term recovery (27-52). Sex-specific continuous trajectories of the median (50th percentile) as well as the 1st (25th percentile) and 3rd quartile (75th percentile) were estimated using quantile regression models with splines for daily walking and standing duration; number of sit-to-stand-to-walk transfers and walking bouts; mean walking bout duration; maximum number of steps per walking bout.

Results: There were 5,900 valid observation days from n = 717 participants (mean age = 83.4 years, SD 6.1). The majority was female (75.3%), with similar sex distribution across all studies. Demographics of both sexes were comparable, but a higher percentage of women was living alone (69.0% compared to 40.9% in men) and had experienced an indoor fall leading to the fracture (74.3% compared to 67.4% in men). There were clear sex differences in mobility recovery. Women improved their mobility faster than men, but men showed larger increases later in the year after surgery. At the end of the first year, both sexes reached comparable levels in almost all mobility parameters.

Conclusion: We identified varying aspects of mobility recovery between men and women, i.e., timely development of mobility recovery shows different patterns. Our findings support the consideration of sex differences in planning and implementing rehabilitation measures for hip fracture patients and highlight the need to provide adapted support at different time points. The underlying mechanisms of these sex differences need further investigation.

Keywords: digital mobility outcomes; hip fracture; mobility; real-world walking; sex differences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of one-year trajectories of mobility outcomes between men and women. (A) Total walking duration per 24 h in minutes; (B) total standing duration per 24 h in minutes; (C) number of sit-to-stand-to-walk transfers per 24 h; (D) number of walking bouts per 24 h; (E) mean walking bout duration per 24 h in seconds; (F) maximum number of steps per walking bout per 24 h; P25: 25th percentile; P75: 75th percentile.

References

    1. Cooper C, Cole ZA, Holroyd CR, Earl SC, Harvey NC, Dennison EM, et al. . Secular trends in the incidence of hip and other osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. (2011) 22:1277–88. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1601-6, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sogaard AJ, Holvik K, Meyer HE, Tell GS, Gjesdal CG, Emaus N, et al. . Continued decline in hip fracture incidence in Norway: a NOREPOS study. Osteoporos Int. (2016) 27:2217–22. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3516-8, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moerman S, Mathijssen NM, Tuinebreijer WE, Nelissen RG, Vochteloo AJ. Less than one-third of hip fracture patients return to their prefracture level of instrumental activities of daily living in a prospective cohort study of 480 patients. Geriatr Gerontol Int. (2018) 18:1244–8. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13471 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Magaziner J, Chiles N, Orwig D. Recovery after hip fracture: interventions and their timing to address deficits and desired outcomes – evidence from the Baltimore hip studies. Nestle Nutr Inst Workshop Ser. (2015) 83:71–81. doi: 10.1159/000382064, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Studenski S, Perera S, Patel K, Rosano C, Faulkner K, Inzitari M, et al. . Gait speed and survival in older adults. JAMA. (2011) 305:50–8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1923, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources