Impact of continuous glucose monitoring on hospitalizations and glucose control in people with type 2 diabetes: real-world analysis
- PMID: 39263872
- DOI: 10.1111/dom.15866
Impact of continuous glucose monitoring on hospitalizations and glucose control in people with type 2 diabetes: real-world analysis
Abstract
Aim: The real-world benefits of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in the broad type 2 diabetes (T2D) population are not well studied. Our study evaluated the impact of CGM use on health care resource utilization over 12 months in adults with T2D.
Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort analysis used Optum's de-identified Market Clarity data of >79 million people to evaluate CGM use in people with T2D who were treated with non-insulin (NIT), basal insulin (BIT) and prandial insulin therapy (PIT). The primary outcomes were changes in all-cause hospitalizations, acute diabetes-related hospitalizations and acute diabetes-related emergency room visits during the 6- and 12-month post-index period following transition from blood glucose monitoring to CGM. A pre-specified subgroup analysis assessed glucose control and medication changes among people with T2D over 1 year.
Results: The analysis included 74 679 adults with T2D (NIT; n = 25 269), (BIT; n = 16 264) and (PIT; n = 33 146). Significant reductions in all-cause hospitalizations, acute diabetes-related hospitalizations and acute diabetes-related emergency room visits were observed in the 6-month post-index period that were sustained during the 6-12 month post-index period (NIT, -10.1%, -31.0%, -30.7%; BIT, -13.9%, -47.6%, -28.2%; and PIT, -22.6%, -52.7%, -36.6%, respectively). A subgroup analysis of 6030 people showed mean glycated haemoglobin reductions at approximately 3 months, which were also sustained throughout the post-index period: NIT, -1.1 (0.05)%; BIT, -1.1 (0.06)%; and PIT, -0.9 (0.04)%, p < 0.0001.
Conclusions: CGM use in real-life across different therapeutic regimens in adults with T2D was associated with reductions in health care resource utilization with improved glucose control over 1 year.
Keywords: continuous glucose monitoring; diabetes‐related events; hospitalizations; insulin; multiple daily injections; non‐insulin.
© 2024 The Author(s). Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood‐glucose control with sulphonlylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet. 1998;352(9131):837‐853.
-
- Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel A, Matthews DR, Neil HAW. 10‐year follow‐up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1577‐1589.
-
- Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long‐term complications of insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:977‐986.
-
- Nathan DM, Cleary PA, Backlund JY, et al. Diabetes control and complications trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes interventions and complications (DCCT/EDIC) study research group: intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2643‐2653.
-
- Bin Rakhis SA Sr, AlDuwayhis NM, Aleid N, AlBarrak AN, Aloraini AA. Glycemic control for type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a systematic review. Cureus. 2022;14(6):e26180. doi:10.7759/cureus.26180
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical