Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 12;19(9):e0308176.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308176. eCollection 2024.

Mutational spectrum of breast cancer by shallow whole-genome sequencing of cfDNA and tumor gene panel analysis

Affiliations

Mutational spectrum of breast cancer by shallow whole-genome sequencing of cfDNA and tumor gene panel analysis

Fernando Ambriz-Barrera et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) has different molecular subgroups related to different risks and treatments. Tumor biopsies for BC detection are invasive and may not reflect tumor heterogeneity. Liquid biopsies have become relevant because they might overcome these limitations. We rationalize that liquid cfDNA biopsies through shallow whole genome sequencing (sWGS) could improve the detection of tumor alterations, complementing the genomic profiling. We evaluated the feasibility to detect somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs) in BC using shallow whole genome sequencing (sWGS) in cfDNA from archived samples from National Cancer Institute of Colombia patients. We sequenced tumor tissues from 38 BC patients with different molecular subtypes using a gene panel of 176 genes significantly mutated in cancer, and by liquid biopsies using sWGS on 20 paired samples to detect SCNAs and compare with the tumor samples. We identified an extensive intertumoral heterogeneity between the molecular subtypes of BC, with a mean tumor load of 602 mutations in the gene panel of tumor tissues. There was a 12.3% of concordance in deletions in the cfDNA-tumor pairs considering only the genes covered by the panel encompassing seven genes: BRCA1, CDK12, NF1, MAP2K4, NCOR1, TP53, and KEAP1 in three patients. This study shows the feasibility to complement the genomic analysis of tumor tissue biopsies to detect SCNA in BC using sWGS in cfDNA, providing a wider identification of potential therapeutic targets.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
(A) Experimental design. The workflow from sample recruitment to sequencing data analysis is shown. Panel 1. Sample selection. Thirty-eight BC patients were selected from the Terry Fox National Tumor Bank (National Cancer Institute in Colombia) diagnosed in a period of 10 years (2007–2017). Panel 2. Sample preparation and barcoding. Genomic DNA was extracted by affinity column followed by library preparation using exome enrichment (176 genes for tumor samples) and shallow whole genome sequencing for cfDNA. The samples were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq in a 2X150 cycle format. Panel 3. Sequencing and data analysis. Identification of SCNAs in both tumor and cfDNA, and SNV in tumor tissues. BC: Breast Cancer; cfDNA: circulating free DNA; sWGS: Shallow Whole Genome Sequencing; SCNA: Somatic Copy Number alteration; SNV: Single Nucleotide Variant. (B) Samples used for this study. cfDNA samples obtained from plasma are depicted in blue, and tumor samples are shown in red. Created with Biorender.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Tumor mutation rate in 38 breast cancer tumor tissues.
Number of mutations segmented by sample type in ascending order. The clinical stages of these tumors are shown in the lower track. The horizontal, dotted line represents the mean mutational load.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Pathogenic variants and VUS identified in 38 breast cancer patients.
The total number of driver genes with variants in each sample are shown in the top panel. Signaling pathways and classification of variants following the recommendations of American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) are shown in the left panel. The clinical characteristics are shown in the bottom panel. UTR: untranslated region; IDC: intraductal carcinoma; CTx: chemotherapy; RTx: radiotherapy; Sx: surgery.
Fig 4
Fig 4. cfDNA concentration between the groups with different stages and treatments.
(A) cfDNA concentration per patient in ascending order, (B) cfDNA concentration by different stages of the disease (ANOVA test, p = 0.60), and (C) distribution of cfDNA concentration and age.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Total somatic copy number alterations events identified in tumor tissues and cfDNA.
(A) Venn diagram depicting the differences and similarity of the SCNAs detected in cfDNA (blue) and tumor tissues (orange). For this analysis only the paired samples were considered (cfDNA-tumor tissues). (B) Number of SCNAs identified in cfDNA and tumor tissues by patient.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Tumor and cfDNA SCNA events in driver genes and clinical characteristics in the cohort.
Samples are presented in two groups, the cfDNA:tumor pairs on the left, and tumor only on the right. The alterations in the cfDNA and tumor samples are illustrated as left and right flags, respectively. The number of affected driver genes in each sample is shown in the top panel. The ASCO/CAP classification, mutation signaling pathways, and relative frequency are shown on the left side. The absolute frequency of SCNA events per gene and the legends are shown on the right. Clinical characteristics are shown in the bottom panel.
Fig 7
Fig 7. Alterations found according to ASCO/CAP classification in BC.
The figure shows the different types of alterations (top), the existing therapeutic targets (left) and the principal pathways affected (right). Created with Biorender.

References

    1. Yersal O, Barutca S. Biological subtypes of breast cancer: Prognostic and therapeutic implications. World Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2014;5(3):412. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i3.412 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Parkin DM, Piñeros M, Znaor A, et al. Cancer statistics for the year 2020: An overview. International Journal of Cancer. 2021;149(4):778–789. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33588 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arnold M, Morgan E, Rumgay H, Mafra A, Singh D, Laversanne M, et al. Current and future burden of breast cancer: Global statistics for 2020 and 2040. The Breast. 2022;66:15–23. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.08.010 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cazap E. Breast Cancer in Latin America: A Map of the Disease in the Region. American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book. 2018;38:451–456. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_201315 - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Lemos LLP, de Souza MC, Moreira DP, Almeida PHRF, Godman B, Verguet S, et al. Stage at diagnosis and stage-specific survival of breast cancer in Latin America and the Caribbean: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE. 2019;14(10):e0224012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224012 - DOI - PMC - PubMed