Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Sep 12:10:e49719.
doi: 10.2196/49719.

Leveraging mHealth Technologies for Public Health

Affiliations
Review

Leveraging mHealth Technologies for Public Health

Pedro Elkind Velmovitsky et al. JMIR Public Health Surveill. .

Abstract

Traditional public health surveillance efforts are generally based on self-reported data. Although well validated, these methods may nevertheless be subjected to limitations such as biases, delays, and costs or logistical challenges. An alternative is the use of smart technologies (eg, smartphones and smartwatches) to complement self-report indicators. Having embedded sensors that provide zero-effort, passive, and continuous monitoring of health variables, these devices generate data that could be leveraged for cases in which the data are related to the same self-report metric of interest. However, some challenges must be considered when discussing the use of mobile health technologies for public health to ensure digital health equity, privacy, and best practices. This paper provides, through a review of major Canadian surveys and mobile health studies, an overview of research involving mobile data for public health, including a mapping of variables currently collected by public health surveys that could be complemented with self-report, challenges to technology adoption, and considerations on digital health equity, with a specific focus on the Canadian context. Population characteristics from major smart technology brands-Apple, Fitbit, and Samsung-and demographic barriers to the use of technology are provided. We conclude with public health implications and present our view that public health agencies and researchers should leverage mobile health data while being mindful of the current barriers and limitations to device use and access. In this manner, data ecosystems that leverage personal smart devices for public health can be put in place as appropriate, as we move toward a future in which barriers to technology adoption are decreasing.

Keywords: apps; digital public health; mHealth; mobile health; mobile phone; population health; public health; self-report; smart technology; surveillance; surveys; wearables.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
HealthKit consent screen.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Soucie JM. Public health surveillance and data collection: general principles and impact on hemophilia care. Hematology. 2012 Apr;17 Suppl 1(0 1):S144–6. doi: 10.1179/102453312X13336169156537. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/22507804 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Section 1: evaluation of the surveillance function at the Public Health Agency of Canada – Introduction. Public Health Agency of Canada. [2018-10-12]. https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/corporate/mandate/about-agency/of... .
    1. Lee LM. Principles and Practice of Public Health Surveillance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2010.
    1. Kjellsson G, Clarke P, Gerdtham UG. Forgetting to remember or remembering to forget: a study of the recall period length in health care survey questions. J Health Econ. 2014 May;35:34–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2014.01.007. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167-6296(14)00008-3 S0167-6296(14)00008-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clarke PM, Fiebig DG, Gerdtham UG. Optimal recall length in survey design. J Health Econ. 2008 Sep;27(5):1275–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.05.012.S0167-6296(08)00083-0 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources