The current application of 3D printing simulator in surgical training
- PMID: 39267979
- PMCID: PMC11390463
- DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1443024
The current application of 3D printing simulator in surgical training
Abstract
In the rapidly evolving field of medical education, the integration of innovative technologies has become paramount to enhance the training and proficiency of future surgeons. Among these advancements, the application of 3D printing technology stands out as a useful tool in surgical training. The advantages of the 3D printing model include customization, re-usability and low-cost. The average cost of the 3D printing simulators was between $100-1000. However, there were extremely high potential labor cost during the 3D printing that hadn't been calculated into. Additionally, in the current stage, the 3D printing simulator still have specific limitations. The most mentioned limitation was poor haptic feedback of the simulators, which was very important during the surgical training, since it is the key element for junior doctors to master practical procedures. Also, some simulators didn't possess the integrated and elaborate structure as the human tissue, hence not the whole surgical procedures can be practiced by the trainees, and further improvement should be made. Although there are shortages, many studies have proved that 3D printing simulator can effectively reduce learning curves and is useful to enhance the trainees' surgical skills.
Keywords: 3D printed; advances; medical education; simulator; surgical training.
Copyright © 2024 Jiang, Jiang, Yang and Li.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Low-cost male urogenital simulator for penile implant surgery training: a 3D printing approach.3D Print Med. 2025 Jan 3;11(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s41205-024-00248-5. 3D Print Med. 2025. PMID: 39804506 Free PMC article.
-
The Development and Initial End-Point User Feedback of a 3D-Printed Adult Proximal Tibia IO Simulator.Cureus. 2022 May 30;14(5):e25481. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25481. eCollection 2022 May. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 35800805 Free PMC article.
-
Creation of a novel simulator for minimally invasive neurosurgery: fusion of 3D printing and special effects.J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2017 Jul;20(1):1-9. doi: 10.3171/2017.1.PEDS16568. Epub 2017 Apr 25. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2017. PMID: 28438070
-
The Use of 3D Printing as an Educational Tool in Orthopaedics.JB JS Open Access. 2025 May 29;10(2):e25.00062. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.25.00062. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun. JB JS Open Access. 2025. PMID: 40443444 Free PMC article. Review.
-
3D-printed patient-specific applications in orthopedics.Orthop Res Rev. 2016 Oct 14;8:57-66. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S99614. eCollection 2016. Orthop Res Rev. 2016. PMID: 30774470 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Correlation between a motion analysis method and Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills for assessing interns' performance in a simulated peg transfer task in Jordan: a validation study.J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2025;22:10. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2025.22.10. Epub 2025 Mar 6. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2025. PMID: 40045155 Free PMC article.
-
The contribution of personalized video feedback to robotic partial nephrectomy training in realistic 3D tumor kidney models: design, production and implementation.Front Surg. 2025 Jul 17;12:1615817. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1615817. eCollection 2025. Front Surg. 2025. PMID: 40746836 Free PMC article.
-
A scoping review of literature about 3D printing: knowledge, skills and attitude for simulation educators in healthcare.3D Print Med. 2025 Aug 25;11(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s41205-025-00292-9. 3D Print Med. 2025. PMID: 40853422 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Seifert LB, Schnurr B, Herrera-Vizcaino C, Begic A, Thieringer F, Schwarz F. 3D-printed patient individualised models vs cadaveric models in an undergraduate oral and maxillofacial surgery curriculum: Comparison of student’s perceptions. Eur J Dent Educ. (2020) 24:799–806. - PubMed
-
- Sonkaya E, Bek Kürklü ZG. Comparisons of student comprehension of 3D-printed, standard model, and extracted teeth in hands-on sessions. Eur J Dent Educ. (2023) 28:452–60. - PubMed
-
- Alrasheed AS, Nguyen LHP, Mongeau L, Funnell WRJ, Tewfik MA. Development and validation of a 3D-printed model of the ostiomeatal complex and frontal sinus for endoscopic sinus surgery training. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. (2017) 7:837–41. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources