Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Aug 29:11:1443024.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1443024. eCollection 2024.

The current application of 3D printing simulator in surgical training

Affiliations
Review

The current application of 3D printing simulator in surgical training

Yang Jiang et al. Front Med (Lausanne). .

Abstract

In the rapidly evolving field of medical education, the integration of innovative technologies has become paramount to enhance the training and proficiency of future surgeons. Among these advancements, the application of 3D printing technology stands out as a useful tool in surgical training. The advantages of the 3D printing model include customization, re-usability and low-cost. The average cost of the 3D printing simulators was between $100-1000. However, there were extremely high potential labor cost during the 3D printing that hadn't been calculated into. Additionally, in the current stage, the 3D printing simulator still have specific limitations. The most mentioned limitation was poor haptic feedback of the simulators, which was very important during the surgical training, since it is the key element for junior doctors to master practical procedures. Also, some simulators didn't possess the integrated and elaborate structure as the human tissue, hence not the whole surgical procedures can be practiced by the trainees, and further improvement should be made. Although there are shortages, many studies have proved that 3D printing simulator can effectively reduce learning curves and is useful to enhance the trainees' surgical skills.

Keywords: 3D printed; advances; medical education; simulator; surgical training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Seifert LB, Schnurr B, Herrera-Vizcaino C, Begic A, Thieringer F, Schwarz F. 3D-printed patient individualised models vs cadaveric models in an undergraduate oral and maxillofacial surgery curriculum: Comparison of student’s perceptions. Eur J Dent Educ. (2020) 24:799–806. - PubMed
    1. Nica DF, Gabor AG, Duma V-F, Tudericiu VG, Tudor A, Sinescu C. Sinus lift and implant insertion on 3d-printed polymeric maxillary models: Ex vivo training for in vivo surgical procedures. J Clin Med. (2021) 10:1–15. 10.3390/jcm10204718 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sonkaya E, Bek Kürklü ZG. Comparisons of student comprehension of 3D-printed, standard model, and extracted teeth in hands-on sessions. Eur J Dent Educ. (2023) 28:452–60. - PubMed
    1. Alrasheed AS, Nguyen LHP, Mongeau L, Funnell WRJ, Tewfik MA. Development and validation of a 3D-printed model of the ostiomeatal complex and frontal sinus for endoscopic sinus surgery training. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. (2017) 7:837–41. - PubMed
    1. Suzuki M, Miyaji K, Watanabe R, Suzuki T, Matoba K, Nakazono A, et al. Repetitive simulation training with novel 3D-printed sinus models for functional endoscopic sinus surgeries. Laryngosc Invest Otolaryngol. (2022) 7:943–54. 10.1002/lio2.873 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources