The current application of 3D printing simulator in surgical training
- PMID: 39267979
- PMCID: PMC11390463
- DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1443024
The current application of 3D printing simulator in surgical training
Abstract
In the rapidly evolving field of medical education, the integration of innovative technologies has become paramount to enhance the training and proficiency of future surgeons. Among these advancements, the application of 3D printing technology stands out as a useful tool in surgical training. The advantages of the 3D printing model include customization, re-usability and low-cost. The average cost of the 3D printing simulators was between $100-1000. However, there were extremely high potential labor cost during the 3D printing that hadn't been calculated into. Additionally, in the current stage, the 3D printing simulator still have specific limitations. The most mentioned limitation was poor haptic feedback of the simulators, which was very important during the surgical training, since it is the key element for junior doctors to master practical procedures. Also, some simulators didn't possess the integrated and elaborate structure as the human tissue, hence not the whole surgical procedures can be practiced by the trainees, and further improvement should be made. Although there are shortages, many studies have proved that 3D printing simulator can effectively reduce learning curves and is useful to enhance the trainees' surgical skills.
Keywords: 3D printed; advances; medical education; simulator; surgical training.
Copyright © 2024 Jiang, Jiang, Yang and Li.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
-
- Seifert LB, Schnurr B, Herrera-Vizcaino C, Begic A, Thieringer F, Schwarz F. 3D-printed patient individualised models vs cadaveric models in an undergraduate oral and maxillofacial surgery curriculum: Comparison of student’s perceptions. Eur J Dent Educ. (2020) 24:799–806. - PubMed
-
- Sonkaya E, Bek Kürklü ZG. Comparisons of student comprehension of 3D-printed, standard model, and extracted teeth in hands-on sessions. Eur J Dent Educ. (2023) 28:452–60. - PubMed
-
- Alrasheed AS, Nguyen LHP, Mongeau L, Funnell WRJ, Tewfik MA. Development and validation of a 3D-printed model of the ostiomeatal complex and frontal sinus for endoscopic sinus surgery training. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. (2017) 7:837–41. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
