Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec;25(5):4062-4077.
doi: 10.1177/15248380241270082. Epub 2024 Sep 13.

The Impact of Rape Myth Education on Jury Decision-Making: A Systematic Review

Lara Flynn Hudspith  1 , Nadia Wager  2 , Dominic Willmott  3   4 , Bernard Gallagher  5
Affiliations

The Impact of Rape Myth Education on Jury Decision-Making: A Systematic Review

Lara Flynn Hudspith et al. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

A systematic review of research exploring the impact of providing rape myth countering information to mock-jurors was conducted. The primary aim of the review was to inform the development of an educational intervention for jurors to reduce potential bias in their decision-making based on belief in prevalent rape myths. In total, the following 12 databases were searched: British Education Index, CINAHL, Child Development and Adolescent Studies, Criminal Justice Abstracts, Educational Administration Abstracts, ERIC, MEDLINE, PsycArticles, PsycInfo, PubMed, Scopus, and Social Care Online. The databases were filtered to return peer-reviewed publications, written in English, and published between 1980 and 2023. The search returned 6,119 potential articles. After duplicates were removed, the 3,202 remaining publications were screened. Only studies that presented rape myth countering information to participants within a mock-juror paradigm were included. Studies that did not compare an information condition to a no-information control condition were excluded, as were those which concerned male rape myths, given the focus on female rape myth beliefs in this review. Eight studies were reviewed and were critically appraised according to validity criteria utilized by Dinos et al. Some evidence emerged to suggest that the provision of judicial directions, expert witness testimony, and complainant statements regarding rape myths can impact upon jury decision-making although the findings were mixed overall. Study limitations regarding internal and external validity were frequently present. Recommendations regarding future research questions and methods are advanced, including those that can inform the development of an effective intervention for jurors.

Keywords: intervention; jury decision-making; sexual assault.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
A flowchart to show the conducted screening process.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Amnesty International UK. (2005). Sexual Assault Research Summary Report. https://www.amnesty.org.uk/press-releases/uk-new-poll-finds-third-people...
    1. Auld R. (2001). Review of the criminal courts in England and Wales. HMSO.
    1. Bornstein B., Golding J., Neuschatz J., Kimbrough C., Reed K., Magyarics C., Luecht K. (2017). Mock juror sampling issues in jury simulation research: A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 41(1), 13–28. 10.1037/lhb0000223 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brekke N., Borgida E. (1988). Expert psychological testimony in rape trials: A social-cognitive analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(3), 372. 10.1037/0022-3514.55.3.372 - DOI
    1. Brownmiller S. (1975). Against our will: Men, women and rape. Secker and Warburg.

Publication types