Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 31;17(1):2399413.
doi: 10.1080/16549716.2024.2399413. Epub 2024 Sep 13.

Can verbal autopsies be used on a national scale? Key findings and lessons from South Africa's national cause-of-death validation study

Affiliations

Can verbal autopsies be used on a national scale? Key findings and lessons from South Africa's national cause-of-death validation study

Monique Maqungo et al. Glob Health Action. .

Abstract

Background: Verbal autopsy (VA), though imperfect, serves as a vital tool to determine cause-of-death, particularly for out-of-facility deaths, but challenges persist in integrating VA into Civil Registration and Vital Statistics systems.

Objective: To describe the challenges and successes of collecting a national sample of verbal autopsy interviews in South Africa to obtain the cause of death profile in 2017/18.

Methods: We recruited next of kin from 27 randomly selected sub-districts (10.5%) across South Africa between September 2017 and April 2018. Trained fieldworkers conducted face-to-face interviews using the WHO2016 VA instrument, with physicians certifying underlying causes of death. Feasibility was evaluated based on response rates, participation, and data quality.

Results: Of the total 36,976 deaths registered, only 26% were identified during recruitment, with a 55% overall response rate for VA interviews. Physician-reviewed VA data were deemed of good quality for assigning underlying causes of death in 83% of cases. By comparing cause-specific mortality fractions, physician-reviewed VA identified 22.3% HIV/AIDS and InterVA-5 identified 18.5%, aligning with burden of disease estimates, while Statistics South Africa reported 4.9% HIV/AIDS.

Conclusions: The study demonstrated the feasibility of using VA on a national scale, but immense challenges in identifying and recruiting next of kin highlight the importance of formalising VAs within the country's death notification system.

Keywords: Cause of death; Civil Registration and Vital Statistics; South Africa; cause-specific mortality fractions; verbal autopsy.

Plain language summary

• Main findings: Next of kin of 9 730 decedents were approached at the time of registration of death and 55% consented to be approached later and agreed to do a VA interview by a trained field-worker; 83% of physician-reviewed VA data were considered high-quality for determining underlying causes and 22.3% of all the deaths were due to HIV/AIDS, much higher than the proportion reported in the national statistical office.• Added knowledge: Implementing the VA on a national scale was achievable but significant challenges in recruiting next of kin, emphasising a need to formalise VAs within the country’s death notification system.• Global health impact for policy and action: Accurate cause-of-death data are crucial for policymakers to make informed decisions about the country’s health system and could be supported by using VAs, particularly for the deaths that occur outside health facilities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Map of selected health sub-districts and provincial boundaries, South African national cause of death validation project 2017/18.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Map of KwaZulu natal showing selected health sub-districts and the address of verbal autopsy interviews conducted for South African national cause of death validation project 2017/18.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Leading causes of death based on 2017 stats SA data compared with physician reviewed verbal autopsy data aggregated to National Burden of disease list.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Leading injury-related causes of death stats SA, 2017 and physician reviewed verbal autopsy data aggregated to national burden of disease list.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Comparison of verbal autopsy cause-specific mortality fractions based on physician reviews with InterVA-5 for the South African national cause of death validation project 2017/18.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lopez AD, Setel PW.. Better health intelligence: a new era for civil registration and vital statistics? BMC Med. 2015;13:73. Epub 2015/04/18. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0333-4 PubMed PMID: 25885782; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4387703. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thomas LM, D’Ambruoso L, Balabanova D. Verbal autopsy in health policy and systems: a literature review. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3:e000639. Epub 2018/05/08. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000639 PubMed PMID: 29736271; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5935163. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. CRVS systems: a cornerstone of sustainable development. Lancet (London England). 2015;385:1917. Epub 2015/06/20. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60943-6 PubMed PMID: 26090623. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abouzahr C. Verbal autopsy: who needs it? Popul Health Metr. 2011;9:19. Epub 2011/07/29. doi: 10.1186/1478-7954-9-19 PubMed PMID: 21794171; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3160912. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. de Savigny D, Riley I, Chandramohan D, et al. Integrating community-based verbal autopsy into civil registration and vital statistics (CRVS): system-level considerations. Glob Health Action. 2017;10:1272882. Epub 2017/02/01. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2017.1272882 PubMed PMID: 28137194; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5328373. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources