Conservative Management of Vulvar Cancer-Where Should We Draw the Line?

Abstract

Vulvar cancer is a rare disease, and cure rates were low until the mid-20th century. The introduction of an en bloc radical vulvectomy and bilateral groin and pelvic lymph node dissection saw them rise from 15-20% to 60-70%. However, this very radical surgery was associated with high physical and psychological morbidity. Wounds were usually left open to granulate, and the average post-operative hospital stay was about 90 days. Many attempts have been made to decrease morbidity without compromising survival. Modifications that have proven to be successful are as follows: (i) the elimination of routine pelvic node dissection, (ii) the use of separate incisions for groin dissection, (iii) the use of unilateral groin dissection for lateral, unifocal lesions, (iv) and radical local excision with 1 cm surgical margins for unifocal lesions. Sentinel node biopsy with ultrasonic groin surveillance for patients with node-negative disease has been the most recent modification and is advocated for patients whose primary cancer is <4 cm in diameter. Controversy currently exists around the need for 1 cm surgical margins around all primary lesions and on the appropriate ultrasonic surveillance for patients with negative sentinel nodes.

Keywords: pelvic lymph node dissection; radical local excision; radical vulvectomy; sentinel node biopsy; surgical margins; ultrasonic groin surveillance; vulvar cancer.

Figure 1

Slow granulation after an en bloc radical vulvectomy and bilateral groin dissection.

Figure 2

Radical local excision for a left postero-lateral lesion and unilateral inguino-femoral lymphadenectomy.