Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1985 Jul-Aug;100(4):406-17.

Hospital cost control in Norway: a decade's experience with prospective payment

Comparative Study

Hospital cost control in Norway: a decade's experience with prospective payment

T S Crane. Public Health Rep. 1985 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Under Norway's prospective payment system, which was in existence from 1972 to 1980, hospital costs increased 15.8 percent annually, compared with 15.3 percent in the United States. In 1980 the Norwegian national government started paying for all institutional services according to a population-based, morbidity-adjusted formula. Norway's prospective payment system provides important insights into problems of controlling hospital costs despite significant differences, including ownership of medical facilities and payment and spending as a percent of GNP. Yet striking similarities exist. Annual real growth in health expenditures from 1972 to 1980 in Norway was 2.2 percent, compared with 2.4 percent in the United States. In both countries, public demands for cost control were accompanied by demands for more services. And problems of geographic dispersion of new technology and distribution of resources were similar. Norway's experience in the 1970s demonstrates that prospective payment is no panacea. The annual budget process created disincentives to hospitals to control costs. But Norway's changes in 1980 to a population-based methodology suggest a useful approach to achieve a more equitable distribution of resources. This method of payment provides incentives to control variations in both admissions and cost per case. In contrast, the Medicare approach based on Diagnostic Related Groups (DRGs) is limited, and it does not affect variations in admissions and capital costs. Population-based methodologies can be used in adjusting DRG rates to control both problems. In addition, the DRG system only applies to Medicare payments; the Norwegian experience demonstrates that this system may result in significant shifting of costs onto other payors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. N Engl J Med. 1969 Oct 16;281(16):880-4 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1970 Jan 15;282(3):135-44 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1973 Dec 6;289(23):1224-9 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1973 Dec 14;182(4117):1102-8 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 1977 Sep;186(3):388-99 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources