Pain Assessment and Analgesic Requirements after Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Comparison Study of Robotic versus Laparoscopic Approaches
- PMID: 39274380
- PMCID: PMC11396669
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm13175168
Pain Assessment and Analgesic Requirements after Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Comparison Study of Robotic versus Laparoscopic Approaches
Abstract
Background: Sleeve gastrectomy is the most common bariatric procedure worldwide, yet postoperative pain management remains a concern. This study aimed to compare pain medication usage and pain scores between laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and robotic sleeve gastrectomy (RSG) patients, addressing the potential benefits of RSG in postoperative pain control. Methods: A retrospective review of our institutional bariatric surgery registry included 484 patients (435 LSG, 49 RSG) who underwent surgery between September 2015 and November 2020. Pain management medications, including opioid use converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores were analyzed postoperatively using mixed-effects models. Results: RSG patients reported lower pain scores in the initial 24 h post-surgery and received significantly lower doses of morphine equivalents compared to LSG patients (median 7.5 mg vs. 12.5 mg, p < 0.001). RSG procedures had longer operative times (122.5 ± 27.1 vs. 89.9 ± 30.5 min, p < 0.001) but a shorter average length of stay (2.24 ± 0.60 vs. 2.65 ± 1.49 days) compared to LSG. Conclusions: These findings suggest that RSG may lead to reduced immediate postoperative pain and lower opioid requirements compared to the laparoscopic approach, despite longer operative times. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these observations and evaluate long-term outcomes.
Keywords: laparoscopic surgery; numerical rating scale; pain assessment; pain management; robotic surgery; sleeve gastrectomy.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Robotic versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a MBSAQIP analysis.Surg Endosc. 2019 Mar;33(3):917-922. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6387-6. Epub 2018 Aug 20. Surg Endosc. 2019. PMID: 30128823
-
Outcomes following robot-assisted versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: the New York State experience.Surg Endosc. 2022 Sep;36(9):6878-6885. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09026-y. Epub 2022 Feb 14. Surg Endosc. 2022. PMID: 35157123
-
Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in the Super-obese.J Surg Res. 2020 May;249:34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.12.012. Epub 2020 Jan 6. J Surg Res. 2020. PMID: 31918328
-
Robotic sleeve gastrectomy: experience of 134 cases and comparison with a systematic review of the laparoscopic approach.Obes Surg. 2013 Nov;23(11):1743-52. doi: 10.1007/s11695-013-1004-1. Obes Surg. 2013. PMID: 23904057
-
Robotic versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a review of the current evidence.Minerva Chir. 2018 Feb;73(1):55-63. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4733.17.07583-6. Epub 2017 Dec 14. Minerva Chir. 2018. PMID: 29243456 Review.
References
-
- American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) Estimate of Bariatric Surgery Numbers. [(accessed on 5 July 2024)]. Available online: https://asmbs.org/resources/estimate-of-bariatric-surgery-numbers/
-
- Gamboa J.S.B. Pain Management in Weight Loss Surgery: Aiming for Multimodal Approach. Adv. Obes. Weight. Manag. Control. 2016;5:232–237. doi: 10.15406/aowmc.2016.05.00125. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources