Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 3;13(17):5227.
doi: 10.3390/jcm13175227.

Respiratory Drive, Effort, and Lung-Distending Pressure during Transitioning from Controlled to Spontaneous Assisted Ventilation in Patients with ARDS: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study

Affiliations

Respiratory Drive, Effort, and Lung-Distending Pressure during Transitioning from Controlled to Spontaneous Assisted Ventilation in Patients with ARDS: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study

Eleonora Balzani et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the impact of patient characteristics and treatment factors on excessive respiratory drive, effort, and lung-distending pressure during transitioning from controlled to spontaneous assisted ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods: Multicenter cohort observational study of patients with ARDS at four academic intensive care units. Respiratory drive (P0.1), diaphragm electrical activity (EAdi), inspiratory effort derived from EAdi (∆PmusEAdi) and from occlusion of airway pressure (∆Pocc) (PmusΔPocc), and dynamic transpulmonary driving pressure (ΔPL,dyn) were measured at the first transition to assisted spontaneous breathing. Results: A total of 4171 breaths were analyzed in 48 patients. P0.1 was >3.5 cmH2O in 10%, EAdiPEAK > 15 µV in 29%, ∆PmusEAdi > 15 cmH2O in 28%, and ΔPL,dyn > 15 cmH2O in 60% of the studied breaths. COVID-19 etiology of ARDS was the strongest independent risk factor for a higher proportion of breaths with excessive respiratory drive (RR 3.00 [2.43-3.71], p < 0.0001), inspiratory effort (RR 1.84 [1.58-2.15], p < 0.0001), and transpulmonary driving pressure (RR 1.48 [1.36-1.62], p < 0.0001). The P/F ratio at ICU admission, days of deep sedation, and dose of steroids were additional risk factors for vigorous inspiratory effort. Age and dose of steroids were risk factors for high transpulmonary driving pressure. Days of deep sedation (aHR 1.15 [1.07-1.24], p = 0.0002) and COVID-19 diagnosis (aHR 6.96 [1-48.5], p = 0.05) of ARDS were independently associated with composite outcome of transitioning from light to deep sedation (RASS from 0/-3 to -4/-5) or return to controlled ventilation within 48 h of spontaneous assisted breathing. Conclusions: This study identified that specific patient characteristics, including age, COVID-19-related ARDS, and P/F ratio, along with treatment factors such as the duration of deep sedation and the dosage of steroids, are independently associated with an increased likelihood of assisted breaths reaching potentially harmful thresholds of drive, effort, and lung-distending pressure during the initial transition to spontaneous assisted breathing. It is noteworthy that patients who were subjected to prolonged deep sedation under controlled mechanical ventilation, as well as those with COVID-19, were more susceptible to failing the transition from controlled to assisted breathing.

Keywords: inspiratory effort; lung-distending pressure acute respiratory distress syndrome; respiratory drive; respiratory monitoring.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percentage of breaths in “Low” (P0.1 < 1 cmH2O), “Normal” (P0.1 1–3.5 cmH2O), and “High” (P0.1 > 3.5 cmH2O) respiratory drive classes (top left). Percentage of breaths in “Low” (EAdiPEAK < 5 µV), “Normal” (EAdiPEAK 5–15 µV), and “High” (EAdiPEAK > 15 µV) neuroventilatory drive classes (top right). Percentage of breaths in the “Normal” (∆PmusEAdi < 15 cmH2O) and “High” (∆PmusEAdi > 15 cmH2O) classes of respiratory effort (bottom left). Percentage of breaths in the “Normal” ΔPL,dyn < 15 cmH2O) and “High” ΔPL,dyn > 15 cmH2O) classes (bottom right).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Rate ratio of treatment factors and patients’ baseline characteristics accounting for proportion of breaths in a higher class of respiratory drive (P0.1) (panel A), inspiratory effort (∆PmusEAdi) (panel B), and lung-distending pressure (ΔPL,dyn) (panel C).

References

    1. Yoshida T., Nakahashi S., Nakamura M.A.M., Koyama Y., Roldan R., Torsani V., De Santis R.R., Gomes S., Uchiyama A., Amato M.B.P., et al. Volume-controlled Ventilation Does Not Prevent Injurious Inflation during Spontaneous Effort. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2017;196:590–601. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201610-1972OC. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yoshida T., Torsani V., Gomes S., De Santis R.R., Beraldo M.A., Costa E.L., Tucci M.R., Zin W.A., Kavanagh B.P., Amato M.B. Spontaneous effort causes occult pendelluft during mechanical ventilation. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2013;188:1420–1427. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201303-0539OC. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yoshida T., Amato M.B.P., Grieco D.L., Chen L., Lima C.A.S., Roldan R., Morais C.C.A., Gomes S., Costa E.L.V., Cardoso P.F.G., et al. Esophageal Manometry and Regional Transpulmonary Pressure in Lung Injury. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2018;197:1018–1026. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201709-1806OC. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grasselli G., Tonetti T., Protti A., Langer T., Girardis M., Bellani G., Laffey J., Carrafiello G., Carsana L., Rizzuto C., et al. Pathophysiology of COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome: A multicentre prospective observational study. Lancet Respir. Med. 2020;8:1201–1208. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30370-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ferrando C., Suarez-Sipmann F., Mellado-Artigas R., Hernandez M., Gea A., Arruti E., Aldecoa C., Martinez-Palli G., Martinez-Gonzalez M.A., Slutsky A.S., et al. Clinical features, ventilatory management, and outcome of ARDS caused by COVID-19 are similar to other causes of ARDS. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:2200–2211. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06192-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources