Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 31;24(17):5677.
doi: 10.3390/s24175677.

Sequential Injection Analysis Method for the Determination of Glutathione in Pharmaceuticals

Affiliations

Sequential Injection Analysis Method for the Determination of Glutathione in Pharmaceuticals

Maja Biocic et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

A sequential injection analysis method for the determination of glutathione (GSH) in pharmaceuticals has been developed. It is based on the reduction of the Cu(II)-neocuproine complex by GSH and the formation of an orange-yellow colored Cu(I)-neocuproine complex with maximum absorbance at 458 nm. Under optimal conditions the method is characterized by a linear calibration range of 6.0 × 10-7-8.0 × 10-5 mol L-1 (Amax = 3270 CGSH - 0.0010; R2 = 0.9983), limit of detection of 2.0 × 10-7 mol L-1, limit of quantification of 6.7 × 10-7 mol L-1, repeatability (expressed as relative standard deviation) of 3.8%, and sampling rate of 60 h-1. The newly developed method has been successfully applied to the determination of GSH in pharmaceutical samples with no statistically significant difference between the results obtained and those produced by the standard Pharmacopoeia method.

Keywords: glutathione; neocuproine; pharmaceuticals; sequential injection analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic diagram of the SIA system: SFP—syringe-free pump (M50), SV—10-port selection valve, HC—holding coil, RC—reaction coil, CS—carrier stream (deionized H2O), RS—reagent stream, FC—flow cell, W—waste.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Siagram of the aspiration sequence of analyte (GSH) and reagent (RS) solutions. Experimental conditions: c(GSH) = 4 × 10−5 mol L−1, c(Cu2+) = 1.0 × 10−4 mol L−1, c(Nc) = 2.4 × 10−4 mol L−1, pH = 3.0, temperature = 25 °C, carrier flow rate = 5000 μL min−1, reagent volume = 200 μL, sample volume = 200 μL, volume of the holding coil = 1000 µL, length of the reaction coil = 65 cm.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effect of the carrier flow rate on peak absorbance (A458 nm). Experimental conditions: c(GSH) = 4 × 10−5 mol L−1, c(Cu2+) = 1 × 10−4 mol L−1, c(Nc) = 2.4 × 10−4 mol L−1, pH = 3.0, temperature = 25 °C, reagent volume = 200 μL, sample volume = 200 μL, volume of the holding coil = 1000 μL, length of the reaction coil = 65 cm. Error bars = ±standard deviation (SD) (n = 3).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Influence of the reagent volume on peak absorbance (A458 nm). Experimental conditions: c(GSH) = 4 × 10−5 mol L−1, c(Cu2+) = 1 × 10−4 mol L−1, c(Nc) = 2.4 × 10−4 mol L−1, pH = 3.0, temperature = 25 °C, carrier flow rate = 3000 mL min−1, sample volume = 200 μL, volume of the holding coil = 1000 μL, length of the reaction coil = 65 cm. Error bars = ±SD (n = 3).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Effect of the sample volume on peak absorbance (A458 nm). Experimental conditions: c(GSH) = 4 × 10−5 mol L−1, c(Cu2+) = 1 × 10−4 mol L−1, c(Nc) = 2.4 × 10−4 mol L−1, pH = 3.0, temperature = 25 °C, carrier flow rate = 3000 mL min−1, reagent volume = 150 μL, volume of the holding coil = 1000 μL, length of the reaction coil = 65 cm. Error bars = ±SD (n = 3).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Effect of the reaction coil length on peak absorbance (A458 nm). Experimental conditions: c(GSH) = 4 × 10−5 mol L−1, c(Cu2+) = 1 × 10−4 mol L−1, c(Nc) = 2.4 × 10−4 mol L−1, pH = 3.0, temperature = 25 °C, carrier flow rate = 3000 mL min−1, reagent volume = 150 μL, sample volume = 200 μL, volume of the holding coil = 500 μL. Error bars = ±SD (n = 3).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Siagrams of the spectrophotometric determination of GSH in the concentration range of 6.0 × 10−7 mol L−1 to 1.0 × 10−4 mol L−1. Inset: calibration curve for the SIA determination of GSH in the range 6.0 × 10−7 mol L−1 to 8.0 × 10−5 mol L−1, obtained under optimal conditions (Table 2).
Figure 8
Figure 8
Siagrams of the spectrophotometric determination of 4 × 10−5 mol L−1 GSH (1) and 4 × 10−5 mol L−1 GSH in the presence of 2 × 10−2 mol L−1 (500 times molar excess) glucose (2), fructose (3), lactose (4), KNO3 (5), Na2SO4 (6), boric acid (7), or 4 × 10−4 mol L−1 (10 times molar excess) sodium citrate, obtained under optimal conditions (Table 2).

Similar articles

References

    1. Aquilano K., Baldelli S., Ciriolo M.R. Glutathione: New roles in redox signaling for an old antioxidant. Front. Pharmacol. 2014;5:196. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2014.00196. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weschawalit S., Thongthip S., Phutrakool P., Asawanonda P. Glutathione and its antiaging and antimelanogenic effects. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dermatol. 2017;10:147–153. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S128339. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berg J.M., Tymoczko J.L., Stryer L. Biochemistry. 5th ed. W.H. Freeman Publishing; New York, NY, USA: 2002. pp. 1018–1029.
    1. Ballatori N., Krance S.M., Notenboom S., Shi S., Tieu K., Hammond C.L. Glutathione dysregulation and the etiology and progression of human diseases. Biol. Chem. 2009;390:191–214. doi: 10.1515/BC.2009.033. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hao Y., Xiong D., Wang L., Chen W., Zhou B., Liu Y.-N. A reversible competition colorimetric assay for the detection of biothiols based on ruthenium-containing complex. Talanta. 2013;115:253–257. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2013.04.076. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources