Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2024 Nov;44(12):1498-1499.
doi: 10.1002/pd.6655. Epub 2024 Sep 14.

Correspondence on "Current Controversy in Prenatal Diagnosis: The Use of cfDNA to Screen for Monogenic Conditions in Low Risk Populations Is Ready for Clinical Use"

Affiliations
Comment

Correspondence on "Current Controversy in Prenatal Diagnosis: The Use of cfDNA to Screen for Monogenic Conditions in Low Risk Populations Is Ready for Clinical Use"

Julia Wynn et al. Prenat Diagn. 2024 Nov.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Comment on

References

    1. N. L. Vora, S. Langlois, and L. S. Chitty, “Current Controversy in Prenatal Diagnosis: The Use of cfDNA to Screen for Monogenic Conditions in Low Risk Populations Is Ready for Clinical Use,” Prenatal Diagnosis 44, no. 4 (2024): 389–397, PMID: 37991340, https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6469.
    1. D. S. Tsao, S. Silas, B. P. Landry, et al., “A Novel High‐Throughput Molecular Counting Method With Single Base‐Pair Resolution Enables Accurate Single‐Gene NIPT,” Scientific Reports 9, no. 1 (2019): 14382, https://doi.org/10.1038/S41598‐019‐50378‐8.
    1. J. Hoskovec, E. E. Hardisty, A. N. Talati, et al., “Maternal Carrier Screening With Single‐Gene NIPS Provides Accurate Fetal Risk Assessments for Recessive Conditions,” Genetics in Medicine 25, no. 2 (2022): 1–103, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2022.10.014.
    1. J. Wynn, J. Hoskovec, R. D. Carter, M. J. Ross, and S. C. Perni, “Performance of Single‐Gene Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Autosomal Recessive Conditions in a General Population Setting,” Prenatal Diagnosis 43, no. 10 (2023): 1344–1354, https://doi.org/10.1002/PD.6427.
    1. R. Ben‐Shachar, A. Svenson, J. D. Goldberg, and D. Muzzey, “A Data‐Driven Evaluation of the Size and Content of Expanded Carrier Screening Panels,” Genetics in Medicine 21, no. 9 (2019): 1931–1939, PMID: 30816298; PMCID: PMC6752311, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436‐019‐0466‐5.

LinkOut - more resources