Hiding in plain sight: Misinterpretation of immunogenic DPB epitopes within G/P groups

Abstract

The clinical impact of HLA DP antibodies is poorly understood, resulting in variable clinical strategies for transplant candidates and recipients with donor-directed HLA-DP antibodies. Complicating matters further, the DPB naming convention is not based on allelic homology and requires sequence alignments to identify potential immunogenic epitopes. Historically, G and P codes, which consolidated alleles that were identical over Exon 2, were used to simplify the reporting of HLA Class II typing as differences outside of Exon 2 have not been considered immunogenic (i.e., able to induce an antibody response). Herein, we present four cases demonstrating that polymorphisms at codons 96R/K and 170I/T, in Exon 3 of DPB, are targets for alloantibody recognition. These regions "hide in plain sight" due to the current use of G/P code-level typing, potentially leading to incorrect compatibility assessments (i.e., virtual crossmatches) and misinterpreted antibody responses. The unintentional crossing of an HLA-DPB donor-specific antibody (DSA) in a solid organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplant may lead to unforeseen deleterious clinical outcomes. Our data underscore the complexities of DPB histocompatibility assessments and highlight the need for adaptable systems that align with evolving research and clinical outcomes.

Keywords: DP; Donor specific antibody (DSA); Epitope; Exon 3; G code; Nomenclature; P code; Virtual crossmatching (VXM).