Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 16;20(18):e1154-e1162.
doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00037.

Treatment extent of femoropopliteal disease and clinical outcomes following endovascular therapy

Affiliations

Treatment extent of femoropopliteal disease and clinical outcomes following endovascular therapy

Yong-Hoon Yoon et al. EuroIntervention. .

Abstract

Background: Endovascular therapy (EVT) has become the preferred treatment modality for femoropopliteal disease. However, there is limited evidence regarding its procedural and clinical outcomes according to the affected area.

Aims: The aim of this study is to investigate clinical outcomes and device effectiveness according to treatment extent in the superficial femoral artery (SFA), popliteal artery (PA), or both.

Methods: In this study, we analysed EVT for SFA (2,404 limbs), PA (155 limbs), SFA/PA (383 limbs) using the population in the K-VIS ELLA (Korean Vascular Intervention Society Endovascular Therapy in Lower Limb Artery Diseases) registry. The primary endpoint was target lesion revascularisation (TLR) at 2 years.

Results: The SFA/PA group exhibited a higher prevalence of anatomical complexity, characterised by long lesions, moderate to severe calcification, and total occlusion. The procedures were successful in 97.2% of SFA, 92.9% of PA, and 95.6% of SFA/PA EVTs. The 2-year TLR rates were 21.1%, 18.6%, and 32.7% in the SFA, PA, and SFA/PA groups, respectively. SFA/PA EVT was associated with a significantly increased risk for TLR compared to the SFA group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.48 [1.09-2.00]; p=0.008) and a trend towards an increased risk compared to the PA group (adjusted HR 1.80 [1.00-3.27]; p=0.052). After overlap weighting, the use of a drug-coated balloon (DCB) was shown to be beneficial, with the lowest TLR rate after SFA and SFA/PA EVT.

Conclusions: In this large real-world registry, SFA/PA EVT was associated with an increased risk for TLR at 2 years compared to the SFA or PA EVT groups, with favourable outcomes when using a DCB or drug-eluting stent in the SFA/PA EVT group.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Study flow.
EVT: endovascular therapy; PA: popliteal artery; SFA: superficial femoral artery
Figure 2
Figure 2. *Analysis based on patient-level data. Kaplan-Meier curves of target lesion revascularisation using overlap weighting between final treatment device groups, stratified by femoropopliteal treatment extent.
The curves represent SFA intervention (A), PA intervention (B), and combined SFA/PA intervention (C). BMS: bare metal stent; DCB: drug-coated balloon; DES: drug-eluting stent; PA: popliteal artery; PB: plain balloon; SFA: superficial femoral artery
Central illustration
Central illustration. Clinical outcomes of endovascular therapy for femoropopliteal disease over a 2-year period based on treatment extent.
*Analysis based on patient-level data. Kaplan-Meier curves for the following clinical outcomes: target lesion revascularisation (A), major amputation (B), major adverse limb event (C), and all-cause death (D). E) summarises the study results. EVT: endovascular therapy; PA: popliteal artery; SFA: superficial femoral artery

References

    1. Aday AW, Matsushita K. Epidemiology of Peripheral Artery Disease and Polyvascular Disease. Circ Res. 2021;128:1818–32. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aboyans V, Ricco JB, Bartelink MEL, Björck M, Brodmann M, Cohnert T, Collet JP, Czerny M, De Carlo, Debus S, Espinola-Klein C, Kahan T, Kownator S, Mazzolai L, Naylor AR, Roffi M, Röther J, Sprynger M, Tendera M, Tepe G, Venermo M, Vlachopoulos C, Desormais I ESC Scientific Document Group. 2017 ESC Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases, in collaboration with the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS): Document covering atherosclerotic disease of extracranial carotid and vertebral, mesenteric, renal, upper and lower extremity arteriesEndorsed by: the European Stroke Organization (ESO)The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur Heart J. 2018;39:763–816. - PubMed
    1. Tepe G, Laird J, Schneider P, Brodmann M, Krishnan P, Micari A, Metzger C, Scheinert D, Zeller T, Cohen DJ, Snead DB, Alexander B, Landini M, Jaff MR IN. PACT SFA Trial Investigators. Drug-coated balloon versus standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for the treatment of superficial femoral and popliteal peripheral artery disease: 12-month results from the IN.PACT SFA randomized trial. Circulation. 2015;131:495–502. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosenfield K, Jaff MR, White CJ, Rocha-Singh K, Mena-Hurtado C, Metzger DC, Brodmann M, Pilger E, Zeller T, Krishnan P, Gammon R, Müller-Hülsbeck S, Nehler MR, Benenati JF, Scheinert D LEVANT 2 Investigators. Trial of a Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon for Femoropopliteal Artery Disease. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:145–53. - PubMed
    1. Liistro F, Angioli P, Porto I, Ducci K, Falsini G, Ventoruzzo G, Ricci L, Scatena A, Grotti S, Bolognese L. Drug-Eluting Balloon Versus Drug-Eluting Stent for Complex Femoropopliteal Arterial Lesions: The DRASTICO Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74:205–15. - PubMed