Simple and Epididymal-Sparing Orchiectomy for Surgical Castration in Stage IV Prostate Cancer
- PMID: 39280863
- PMCID: PMC11398619
- DOI: 10.31486/toj.24.0013
Simple and Epididymal-Sparing Orchiectomy for Surgical Castration in Stage IV Prostate Cancer
Abstract
Background: Androgen deprivation therapy, the mainstay of treatment for patients with advanced prostate cancer, can be either medical or surgical. Surgery has cost benefits compared to medical treatment. In this study, we evaluated the use of simple and epididymal-sparing orchiectomy in 2 different practice settings for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. Methods: We reviewed patients who underwent surgical castration for metastatic prostate cancer between 2011 and 2022. The primary outcome was achieving castration-level total testosterone of <50 ng/dL. We also compared the characteristics of patients who were seen at a public academic teaching hospital vs those who were seen at a private community hospital (oncology group practice), and we evaluated the impact of orchiectomy approach (simple vs epididymal-sparing orchiectomy) on patient outcomes. Results: We analyzed 101 patients who underwent orchiectomy: 40 (39.6%) at a public academic teaching hospital and 61 (60.4%) at a private community hospital (oncology group practice). Of these patients, 81 (80.2%) underwent simple orchiectomy and 20 (19.8%) underwent epididymal-sparing orchiectomy. Forty-nine patients (48.5%) had previously received medical androgen deprivation therapy, 9 (18.4%) of whom had medication adherence issues. Patient age, race, and marital status differed significantly between hospital facilities. The overall surgical complication rate was 3.0%. Postoperative total testosterone levels were available for 81 patients, drawn a median of 57 days after surgery [IQR 30, 123]. All patients had castrate-level total testosterone (median 10 ng/dL [IQR 9, 19]) postoperatively, with no differences seen between surgery location (P = 0.84) or surgical technique (P = 0.90). Conclusion: Simple or epididymal-sparing orchiectomy is safe and effective for surgical castration and is an alternative to medical androgen deprivation therapy for patients diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer regardless of the practice demographics.
Keywords: Castration; orchiectomy; prostate neoplasms.
©2024 by the author(s); Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).
Figures






Similar articles
-
Epididymal Sparing Bilateral Simple Orchiectomy: Cost-Effectiveness and Aesthetic Preservation for Men with Metastatic Prostate Cancer.Urol Pract. 2016 Mar;3(2):112-117. doi: 10.1016/j.urpr.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Dec 1. Urol Pract. 2016. PMID: 37592511
-
Prospective randomised controlled trial comparing sub-epididymal orchiectomy versus conventional orchiectomy in metastatic carcinoma of prostate.Indian J Surg. 2011 Jun;73(3):175-7. doi: 10.1007/s12262-010-0207-0. Epub 2011 Feb 1. Indian J Surg. 2011. PMID: 22654325 Free PMC article.
-
Quality of life in low-income men after surgical castration for metastatic prostate cancer.Urol Oncol. 2022 Jul;40(7):343.e7-343.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.04.009. Epub 2022 May 15. Urol Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35581122 Free PMC article.
-
Serum testosterone levels after medical or surgical androgen deprivation: a comprehensive review of the literature.Urol Oncol. 2014 Jan;32(1):38.e17-28. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.03.007. Epub 2013 Jun 13. Urol Oncol. 2014. PMID: 23769268 Review.
-
How do we define "castration" in men on androgen deprivation therapy?Asian J Androl. 2020 Sep-Oct;22(5):441-446. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_139_19. Asian J Androl. 2020. PMID: 31997782 Free PMC article. Review.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources