Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2024 Aug 31;13(8):1344-1348.
doi: 10.21037/gs-24-182. Epub 2024 Aug 20.

The state of robotic vs. open pancreatoduodenectomy

Kosei Takagi  1 , Tomokazu Fuji  1 , Kazuya Yasui  1 , Motohiko Yamada  1 , Takeyoshi Nishiyama  1 , Yasuo Nagai  1 , Noriyuki Kanehira  1 , Toshiyoshi Fujiwara  1
Affiliations
Editorial

The state of robotic vs. open pancreatoduodenectomy

Kosei Takagi et al. Gland Surg. .
No abstract available

Keywords: Robotic surgery; open surgery; outcomes; pancreatoduodenectomy (PD).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All the authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://gs.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/gs-24-182/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Innovative surgical techniques in RPD. (A) The mesenteric Kocher maneuver. (B) Surgical approaches to the superior mesenteric artery. Ph, pancreatic head; LRV, left renal vein; IVC, inferior vena cava; CHA, common hepatic artery; SMA, superior mesenteric artery; SMV, superior mesenteric vein; Pb, pancreatic body; J1V, first jejunal vein; RPD, robotic pancreatoduodenectomy.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment on

References

    1. Takagi K, Yagi T, Yoshida R, et al. Surgical Outcome of Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Analysis of a 17-Year Experience at a Single Center. Acta Med Okayama 2016;70:197-203. - PubMed
    1. Asbun HJ, Moekotte AL, Vissers FL, et al. The Miami International Evidence-based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection. Ann Surg 2020;271:1-14. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003590 - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Rooij T, van Hilst J, Boerma D, et al. Impact of a Nationwide Training Program in Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy (LAELAPS). Ann Surg 2016;264:754-62. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001888 - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Rooij T, van Hilst J, Topal B, et al. Outcomes of a Multicenter Training Program in Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy (LAELAPS-2). Ann Surg 2019;269:344-50. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002563 - DOI - PubMed
    1. van Hilst J, de Rooij T, Bosscha K, et al. Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours (LEOPARD-2): a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019;4:199-207. 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30004-4 - DOI - PubMed