Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
[Preprint]. 2024 Sep 6:2024.09.06.611608.
doi: 10.1101/2024.09.06.611608.

Transfer RNA levels are tuned to support differentiation during Drosophila neurogenesis

Affiliations

Transfer RNA levels are tuned to support differentiation during Drosophila neurogenesis

Rhondene Wint et al. bioRxiv. .

Update in

Abstract

Neural differentiation requires a multifaceted program to alter gene expression along the proliferation to differentiation axis. While critical changes occur at the level of transcription, post-transcriptional mechanisms allow fine-tuning of protein output. We investigated the role of tRNAs in regulating gene expression during neural differentiation by quantifying tRNA abundance in neural progenitor-biased and neuron-biased Drosophila larval brains. We found that tRNA profiles are largely consistent between progenitor-biased and neuron-biased brains but significant variation occurs for 10 cytoplasmic isodecoders (individual tRNA genes) and this establishes differential tRNA levels for 8 anticodon groups. We used these tRNA data to investigate relationships between tRNA abundance, codon optimality-mediated mRNA decay, and translation efficiency in progenitors and neurons. Our data reveal that tRNA levels strongly correlate with codon optimality-mediated mRNA decay within each cell type but generally do not explain differences in stabilizing versus destabilizing codons between cell types. Regarding translation efficiency, we found that tRNA expression in neural progenitors preferentially supports translation of mRNAs whose products are in high demand in progenitors, such as those associated with protein synthesis. In neurons, tRNA expression shifts to disfavor translation of proliferation-related transcripts and preferentially support translation of transcripts tied to neuron-specific functions like axon pathfinding and synapse formation. Overall, our analyses reveal that changes in tRNA levels along the neural differentiation axis support optimal gene expression in progenitors and neurons.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. tRNA levels are largely constant between neuroblast-biased and neuron-biased brains, but variation exists for a subset of anticodon groups.
(A) Hierarchically clustered heatmap showing the average expression level of 84 nuclear-encoded Drosophila tRNA genes (isodecoders). Counts were normalized to Trimmed Mean of M-values (TMM). An X in the isodecoder name indicates that more than one gene encodes that particular isodecoder and those genes are not distinguishable by mature tRNA sequence. (B) Volcano plot showing the relative isodecoder expression level for nuclear-encoded (cytosolic) and mitochondrial tRNA genes on the x-axis (fold change = average Neuroblast TMM / average Neuron TMM) and the false discovery rate q-value. tRNAs with a log2 fold change ≥ ± 0.5 and q-value ≤ 0.1 are highlighted in red. **** denotes that Gly-GCC-1-X is off scale, with a q-value < 0.001. (C) Hierarchically clustered heatmap showing the average expression level (normalized to Trimmed Mean of M-values (TMM)) for 44 anticodon groups (isoacceptors). Differentially expressed isoacceptors (q-value < 0.1) are highlighted in red.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Codon optimality-mediated decay is similar in neuroblasts and neurons and correlates with the stability of functionally related mRNAs.
(A) Codon stabilization coefficients (CSCs) were calculated using neuroblast-specific and neuron-specific transcriptome-wide mRNA decay measurements [24]. (B) Gene ontology (GO) categories of mRNAs enriched with optimal codons or non-optimal codons. 5,169 neural transcripts (mRNAs present in neuroblast-biased and neuron-biased brains) were ranked by percent optimal codon content (defined by optimality in neuroblasts): the top 10% optimal codon enriched mRNAs (left panel) and the top 10% non-optimal codon enriched mRNAs (right panel) were used for GO analysis. The top five (ranked by adjusted p-value) non-redundant GO categories and corresponding adjusted p-values are listed. Neuroblast-specific and neuron-specific mRNA decay data [24] for the transcripts within each GO category were used to calculate average mRNA half-life. The number of transcripts in each GO category is listed to the right of the plot bars. Error marks are standard error of the mean. Adjusted p-value is based on the Bonferroni correction.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. tRNA abundance correlates with codon-mediated mRNA decay in neuroblasts and neurons.
(A) Scatter plots comparing tRNA isoacceptor abundance and codon stabilization coefficient (CSC) in each cell type (neuroblast data in left panel, neuron data in right panel). (B) Relationship between tRNA adaptation index (tAI) and CSC in each cell type (neuroblast data in left panel, neuron data in right panel). The effect size was measured by Cohen’s d and significance (p-value) was determined by Welch’s t-test. (C) Scatterplot comparing tAI_gene and mRNA half-life for 5,169 transcripts present in neuroblast-biased and neuron-biased brains. (D) Heatmaps comparing differential tAI (left column) and differential CSC (right column). Only absolute Δ tAI values ≥ 0.2 are shown. Only CSCs that differed in category (optimal, neutral, non-optimal) are shown, according to the following criteria: optimal (CSC ≥ 0.01) in one cell type but neutral (0.01 > CSC > −0.01) or non-optimal (CSC ≤ −0.01) in the other.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. tRNA adaptation during neural differentiation supports distinct translation programs.
(A) Hierarchically clustered heatmap showing neuroblast-specific and neuron-specific tAI_gene values for 5,169 neural mRNAs. Three emergent patterns are outlined in colored boxes: green for high tAI_gene in neuroblasts and neurons (“shared high”, n = 517 mRNAs), tan for low tAI_gene in neuroblasts and neurons (“shared low”, n = 411 mRNAs), and blue for increased tAI_gene in neurons compared to neuroblasts (“neuron up”, n = 965 mRNAs). (B) Biological function gene ontology (GO) category enrichment in each of the tAI_gene groups identified in part A. Bar color matches the group color in part A. Up to ten of the most significantly enriched GO categories, with adjusted p-value ≤ 0.0001, are listed (fewer categories if the p-value cutoff was not met). Adjusted p-values are based on the Bonferroni correction. (C) Molecular function GO category enrichment for transcripts present in the “neuron morphogenesis”, “photoreceptor cell development”, and “peripheral nervous development” Biological GO categories shown in part B. The ten most significantly enriched Molecular GO categories for each group (neuron up, shared low) are listed. Adjusted p-value is based on the Bonferroni correction.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.. mRNAs enriched in proliferation-associated codons are poorly adapted for translation by the post-differentiation tRNA pool.
(A) Principal component analysis (PCA) on the normalized codon frequencies of 5,169 mRNAs present in neuroblast-biased brains and neuron-biased brains. PCA captured a total variation of 23%, with 15% of the variance in principal component 1 (PC1). Unsupervised clustering by kmeans grouped the mRNAs into 5 clusters. (B) GO analysis of mRNAs within kmeans clusters at opposite ends of PC1: cluster 0 and cluster 4. (C) PCA plot from part A recolored with the Codon Adaptation Index (CAI) of each mRNA. (D) Scatterplot comparing CAI and the change in Supply Demand Ratio (SDR) between neurons and neuroblasts (ΔSDR = Neuron SDR – Neuroblast SDR). The Pearson R value and line of best fit show the inverse relationship between CAI and neuron-optimal SDR. (E) The 5,169 neural mRNAs were ranked by _SDR (Neuron SDR – Neuroblast SDR) and the top 10% (increased SDR) and bottom 10% (decreased SDR) were subject to GO analysis. Significantly enriched GO categories with a Bonferroni adjusted p-value < 10−5 are listed.

References

    1. Teixeira FK, Lehmann R. Translational Control during Developmental Transitions. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2019. Jun 3;11(6):a032987. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a032987. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pinzaru AM, Tavazoie SF. Transfer RNAs as dynamic and critical regulators of cancer progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2023. Nov;23(11):746–761. doi: 10.1038/s41568-023-00611-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Orellana EA, Siegal E, Gregory RI. tRNA dysregulation and disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2022. Nov;23(11):651–664. doi: 10.1038/s41576-022-00501-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Advani VM, Ivanov P. Translational Control under Stress: Reshaping the Translatome. Bioessays. 2019. May;41(5):e1900009. doi: 10.1002/bies.201900009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Torrent M, Chalancon G, de Groot NS, Wuster A, Madan Babu M. Cells alter their tRNA abundance to selectively regulate protein synthesis during stress conditions. Sci Signal. 2018. Sep 4;11(546):eaat6409. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aat6409. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources