Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 2:20:100759.
doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100759. eCollection 2024 Dec.

Do different mechanical compressors provide equivalent hemodynamic support during cardiopulmonary resuscitation?

Ivan Silvestri  1   2 , Giuseppe Stirparo  3 , Claudia Bonetti  1   2 , Beatrice Guerra Maria  1   2 , Serena Ruberti  3   4 , Anna Coppo  3 , Maurizio Migliari  3 , Giuseppe Ristagno  1   2
Affiliations

Do different mechanical compressors provide equivalent hemodynamic support during cardiopulmonary resuscitation?

Ivan Silvestri et al. Resusc Plus. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: No relationship exists between any of the authors and any commercial entity or product mentioned in this manuscript that might represent a conflict of interest. No inducements have been made by any commercial entity to submit the manuscript for publication. GR is the European Resuscitation Council Director Congresses and Board member of Resuscitation Plus. All the other authors declared no COI.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Population characteristics and end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in the whole population and in shockable and not-shockable cardiac arrests (CA). CA, cardiac arrest; CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; EMS, Emergency Medical system; ROSC, return of spontaneous circulation. Data in table are reported as n (%) or median [IQR]. Data in graphs are reported as mean over time (minutes of CPR). * p < 0.05 vs. LUCAS®.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Magliocca A., Castagna V., Fornari C., et al. Transthoracic impedance variability to assess quality of chest compression in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2024;68:556–566. - PubMed
    1. Nordseth T., Eftestøl T., Aramendi E., et al. Extracting physiologic and clinical data from defibrillators for research purposes to improve treatment for patients in cardiac arrest. Resusc Plus. 2024;18 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kool M., Atkins D.L., Van de Voorde P., et al. Focused echocardiography, end-tidal carbon dioxide, arterial blood pressure or near-infrared spectroscopy monitoring during paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A scoping review. Resusc Plus. 2021;6 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Magliocca A., Olivari D., De Giorgio D., et al. LUCAS versus manual chest compression during ambulance transport: A hemodynamic study in a porcine model of cardiac arrest. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lederer W., Schwaiger D., Baubin M.A. Improving survival from mechanical chest compression resuscitation. Resusc Plus. 2022;11 - PMC - PubMed