Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 12;4(2):142-152.
doi: 10.1016/j.jncc.2024.01.007. eCollection 2024 Jun.

Application of Survival Quilts for prognosis prediction of gastrectomy patients based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and China National Cancer Center Gastric Cancer database

Affiliations

Application of Survival Quilts for prognosis prediction of gastrectomy patients based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and China National Cancer Center Gastric Cancer database

Lulu Zhao et al. J Natl Cancer Cent. .

Abstract

Objective: Accurate prognosis prediction is critical for individualized-therapy making of gastric cancer patients. We aimed to develop and test 6-month, 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) prediction models for gastric cancer patients following gastrectomy.

Methods: We derived and tested Survival Quilts, a machine learning-based model, to develop 6-month, 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS and CSS prediction models. Gastrectomy patients in the development set (n = 20,583) and the internal validation set (n = 5,106) were recruited from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, while those in the external validation set (n = 6,352) were recruited from the China National Cancer Center Gastric Cancer (NCCGC) database. Furthermore, we selected gastrectomy patients without neoadjuvant therapy as a subgroup to train and test the prognostic models in order to keep the accuracy of tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage. Prognostic performances of these OS and CSS models were assessed using the Concordance Index (C-index) and area under the curve (AUC) values.

Results: The machine learning model had a consistently high accuracy in predicting 6-month, 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS in the SEER development set (C-index = 0.861, 0.832, 0.789, 0.766, 0.740, and 0.709; AUC = 0.784, 0.828, 0.840, 0.849, 0.869, and 0.902, respectively), SEER validation set (C-index = 0.782, 0.739, 0.712, 0.698, 0.681, and 0.660; AUC = 0.751, 0.772, 0.767, 0.762, 0.766, and 0.787, respectively), and NCCGC set (C-index = 0.691, 0.756, 0.751, 0.737, 0.722, and 0.701; AUC = 0.769, 0.788, 0.790, 0.790, 0.787, and 0.788, respectively). The model was able to predict 6-month, 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year CSS in the SEER development set (C-index = 0.879, 0.858, 0.820, 0.802, 0.784, and 0.774; AUC = 0.756, 0.827, 0.852, 0.863, 0.874, and 0.884, respectively) and SEER validation set (C-index = 0.790, 0.763, 0.741, 0.729, 0.718, and 0.708; AUC = 0.706, 0.758, 0.767, 0.766, 0.766, and 0.764, respectively). In multivariate analysis, the high-risk group with risk score output by 5-year OS model was proved to be a strong survival predictor both in the SEER development set (hazard ratio [HR] = 14.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.872-2.774, P < 0.001), SEER validation set (HR = 2.28, 95% CI: 13.089-16.293, P < 0.001), and NCCGC set (HR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.617-2.437, P < 0.001). We further explored the prognostic value of risk score resulted 5-year CSS model of gastrectomy patients, and found that high-risk group remained as an independent CSS factor in the SEER development set (HR = 12.81, 95% CI: 11.568-14.194, P < 0.001) and SEER validation set (HR = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.338-1.935, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Survival Quilts could allow accurate prediction of 6-month, 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS and CSS in gastric cancer patients following gastrectomy.

Keywords: Cancer specific survival; Gastric cancer; Overall survival; Prognosis; Survival Quilts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram illustrating recruitment of gastrectomy patients. CSS, cancer specific survival; NCCGC, National Cancer Center Gastric Cancer; SEER, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results; OS, overall survival.
Fig 2
Fig. 2
Time-dependent AUC values and ROC curves for each OS or CSS prediction model of gastrectomy patients. The OS models in (A) SEER development set, (B) SEER validation set, and (C) NCCGC set; CSS models in (D) SEER development set and (E) SEER validation set. AUC, area under the curve; CSS, cancer-specific survival; NCCGC, National Cancer Center Gastric Cancer; OS, overall survival; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; SEER, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results .
Fig 3
Fig. 3
The Kaplan-Meier curves of high-risk and low-risk groups with risk score resulted 6-month, 1-, 2-, 3-, 5- and 10-year OS prediction models. The curves of two groups in SEER development set (A-F), SEER validation set (G-L) and NCCGC set (M-R), and all P < 0.001. NCCGC, National Cancer Center Gastric Cancer; OS, overall survival; SEER, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results.
Fig 4
Fig. 4
The Kaplan-Meier curves of high-risk and low-risk groups with risk score resulted 6-month, 1-, 2-, 3-, 5- and 10-year CSS prediction models. The curves of two groups in SEER development set (A-F) and SEER validation set (G-L), and all P < 0.001. CSS, cancer-specific survival; SEER, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results.
Fig 5
Fig. 5
The OS multivariate analysis of high-risk group in the SEER development set (A), SEER validation set (B), and NCCGC set (C). NCCGC, National Cancer Center Gastric Cancer; OS, overall survival; SEER, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results.
Fig 6
Fig. 6
The CSS multivariate analysis of high-risk group in the SEER development set (A) and SEER validation set (B). CSS, cancer-specific survival; SEER, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results.

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249. - PubMed
    1. Petrillo A, Pompella L, Tirino G, et al. Perioperative treatment in resectable gastric cancer: current perspectives and future directions. Cancers. 2019;11(3):1–21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shin HJ, Choi YO, Roh CK, et al. Prediction of survival outcomes based on preoperative clinical parameters in gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(12):7027–7037. - PubMed
    1. Hori S, Honda M, Kobayashi H, et al. A grading system for predicting the prognosis of gastric cancer with liver metastasis. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2021;51(11):1601–1607. - PubMed
    1. Gupta V, Coburn N, Kidane B, et al. Survival prediction tools for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer: a systematic review. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;156(2):847–856. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources