Understanding pelvic mobility is important to correctly diagnose and treat painful hips with positive impingement test in non-arthritic patients
- PMID: 39283497
- DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05540-x
Understanding pelvic mobility is important to correctly diagnose and treat painful hips with positive impingement test in non-arthritic patients
Abstract
Introduction: To determine repeatability of pelvic mobility, calculated as both change in sacral slope (∆SS) and pelvic tilt (∆PT), and evaluate their correlations with pelvic incidence (PI) in non-arthritic patients with hip pain and positive impingement test.
Methods: The cohort comprised 82 patients aged 31.8 ± 7.4, with hip pain and positive impingement test. Stereo-radiographic images were acquired in three positions (neutral standing, neutral sitting, and flexed-forward-sitting). PI, pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS) were measured. Repeatability was evaluated. Pelvic mobility was calculated as ΔPT and ΔSS from (i) standing to sitting, (ii) neutral to flexed-forward-sitting, and (iii) maximum to minimum values. Correlations of PI with PT, SS, ΔPT, and ΔSS were assessed.
Results: Repeatability was excellent for all pelvic mobility measurements (intraclass correlation coefficients, ICC > 0.97). ΔPT was 25.9 ± 8.3º from standing to sitting, 14.4 ± 11.2º from standing to flexed-forward-sitting, and 37.8 ± 13.7º from maximum to minimum values. ΔSS was 24.0 ± 7.6º from standing to sitting, 14.2 ± 11.6º from standing to flexed-forward-sitting, and 35.9 ± 13.7º from maximum to minimum values. PI was strongly correlated with PT in standing (r = 0.7) and SS in standing (r = 0.7), and moderately correlated with PT in sitting (r = 0.6) and SS in sitting (r = 0.5), but was not correlated with neither ΔPT nor ΔSS (r < 0.3).
Conclusion: Pelvic mobility, calculated as ΔPT and ΔSS, has excellent repeatability, and is not correlated with PI in non-arthritic patients with hip pain. Therefore, PI is of limited value for diagnosis and treatment of painful hips with positive impingement test, as well as to distinguish hip users from spine users; pelvic mobility should be used instead.
Level of evidence: Level IV.
Keywords: Femoroacetabular impingement; Pelvic incidence; Pelvic mobility; Spino-pelvic parameters.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Effect of Spinopelvic Parameters on Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.Am J Sports Med. 2024 Jun;52(7):1735-1743. doi: 10.1177/03635465241248447. Epub 2024 May 20. Am J Sports Med. 2024. PMID: 38767153
-
The Evaluation of Sagittal Pelvic-Femoral Kinematics in Patients with Cam-Type Femoracetabular Impingement.Orthop Surg. 2021 Aug;13(6):1748-1754. doi: 10.1111/os.13038. Epub 2021 Aug 19. Orthop Surg. 2021. PMID: 34411458 Free PMC article.
-
Can pelvic incidence affect changes in sagittal spino-pelvic parameters between standing and sitting positions in individuals with lumbar degenerative disease?Eur Spine J. 2024 Dec;33(12):4598-4604. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08441-0. Epub 2024 Aug 7. Eur Spine J. 2024. PMID: 39110239
-
Functional Anatomy of the Hip Joint.J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jan;36(1):374-378. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.07.065. Epub 2020 Jul 31. J Arthroplasty. 2021. PMID: 32839062
-
Spinopelvic Compensatory Mechanisms for Reduced Hip Motion (ROM) in the Setting of Hip Osteoarthritis.Spine Deform. 2019 Nov;7(6):923-928. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2019.03.007. Spine Deform. 2019. PMID: 31732003 Review.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous