Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2024 Sep 16;19(9):e0309992.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309992. eCollection 2024.

Comparison of regulatory approval system for medicines in emergency among Japan, the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe, and China

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of regulatory approval system for medicines in emergency among Japan, the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe, and China

Kazuki Edo et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The approval of pharmaceuticals in response to the COVID-19 pandemic is a global concern, and during emergencies, emergency approval or authorization systems that enable the rapid use of unapproved drugs to maintain national health are essential. However, there is limited research comparing these systems across countries and their effects. This cross-sectional study examined such systems in Japan (JP), Europe (EU), the United Kingdom (UK), and China (CN) for pharmaceuticals (n = 23) authorized under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) in the United States (US) between December 2019 to July 2023. As of the end of July 2023, JP had granted approval or permission for 14 drugs (60.9%), EU for 14 (60.9%), UK for 12 (52.2%), and CN for three (13.0%). An examination of the developmental status of the 23 drugs revealed that JP had 6 drugs (26.1%), the EU had 3 drugs (8.7%), the UK had 5 drugs (21.7%), and CN had 16 drugs (69.6%) yet to be developed. The US had significantly more granted permissions and developed drugs, while CN the least. The UK had a significantly shorter period for approval than the US and the shortest overall. The EU had the shortest period from the issuance of EUA to approval dates. Although not statistically significant, JP had the longest duration until unapproved drugs could be used. Pharmaceuticals granted usage permission under the EUA in JP, the EU, and the UK were developed or on the market in over 70% of cases, whereas in CN, more than two-thirds were yet to be developed. This suggests that CN may not actively utilize pharmaceuticals from other countries for COVID-19 treatment and may rely on its own. When comparing the emergency approval and permission systems of each country, the most significant difference was in the type of system granting approval.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

M.K. is an employee of Astellas Pharma Inc. Other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on the sharing of data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flowchart of drugs authorized for use under Emergency Use Authorization by FDA against COVID-19.
COVID-19: Coronavirus disease 2019, EUA: Emergency Use Authorization.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Review period of regulatory authority in each country for drugs authorized for use under Emergency Use Authorization by FDA against COVID-19.
The horizontal line in each box represents the median. The x mark represents the average values. The lines at the top and bottom edges of each box represent the 75th and 25th percentiles, respectively. The upper and lower limits of the vertical lines represent the maximum and minimum values, respectively. US: United States; JP: Japan; EU: Europe; UK: United Kingdom.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Period from the date of grant for Emergency Use Authorization to the date of approval in each country.
The horizontal line in each box represents the median. The x mark represents the average values. The lines at the top and bottom edges of each box represent the 75th and 25th percentiles, respectively. The upper and lower limits of the vertical lines represent the maximum and minimum values, respectively. JP: Japan, EU: Europe, UK: the United Kingdom.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wouters OJ, Shadlen KC, Salcher-Konrad M, Pollard AJ, Larson HJ, Teerawattananon Y, et al.. Challenges in ensuring global access to COVID-19 vaccines: production, affordability, allocation, and deployment. Lancet. 2021;397: 1023–1034. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00306-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hotez PJ, Batista C, Amor YB, Ergonul O, Figueroa JP, Gilbert S, et al.. Global public health security and justice for vaccines and therapeutics in the COVID-19 pandemic. EClinicalmedicine. 2021;39: 101053. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101053 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Han E, Tan MMJ, Turk E, Sridhar D, Leung GM, Shibuya K, et al.. Lessons learnt from easing COVID-19 restrictions: an analysis of countries and regions in Asia Pacific and Europe. Lancet. 2020;396: 1525–1534. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32007-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lythgoe Mark P., and Middleton Paul. "Comparison of COVID-19 vaccine approvals at the US Food and Drug administration, European Medicines agency, and health Canada." JAMA Network Open 4.6 (2021): e2114531–e2114531. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.145315 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maeda H. Japan’s special approval for emergency system during the COVID-19 pandemic. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022;111: 551–558. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2310 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types