Comparison of regulatory approval system for medicines in emergency among Japan, the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe, and China
- PMID: 39283913
- PMCID: PMC11404807
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309992
Comparison of regulatory approval system for medicines in emergency among Japan, the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe, and China
Abstract
The approval of pharmaceuticals in response to the COVID-19 pandemic is a global concern, and during emergencies, emergency approval or authorization systems that enable the rapid use of unapproved drugs to maintain national health are essential. However, there is limited research comparing these systems across countries and their effects. This cross-sectional study examined such systems in Japan (JP), Europe (EU), the United Kingdom (UK), and China (CN) for pharmaceuticals (n = 23) authorized under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) in the United States (US) between December 2019 to July 2023. As of the end of July 2023, JP had granted approval or permission for 14 drugs (60.9%), EU for 14 (60.9%), UK for 12 (52.2%), and CN for three (13.0%). An examination of the developmental status of the 23 drugs revealed that JP had 6 drugs (26.1%), the EU had 3 drugs (8.7%), the UK had 5 drugs (21.7%), and CN had 16 drugs (69.6%) yet to be developed. The US had significantly more granted permissions and developed drugs, while CN the least. The UK had a significantly shorter period for approval than the US and the shortest overall. The EU had the shortest period from the issuance of EUA to approval dates. Although not statistically significant, JP had the longest duration until unapproved drugs could be used. Pharmaceuticals granted usage permission under the EUA in JP, the EU, and the UK were developed or on the market in over 70% of cases, whereas in CN, more than two-thirds were yet to be developed. This suggests that CN may not actively utilize pharmaceuticals from other countries for COVID-19 treatment and may rely on its own. When comparing the emergency approval and permission systems of each country, the most significant difference was in the type of system granting approval.
Copyright: © 2024 Edo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
M.K. is an employee of Astellas Pharma Inc. Other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on the sharing of data and materials.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Comparison between European Medicines Agency and US Food and Drug Administration in Granting Accelerated Marketing Authorizations for Covid-19 Medicines and their Utilized Regulations.Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024 Jan;58(1):79-113. doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00574-6. Epub 2023 Oct 20. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024. PMID: 37861859 Free PMC article.
-
Emergency authorization of medical products: regulatory challenges from the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic in Japan.Biosecur Bioterror. 2012 Dec;10(4):372-82. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2012.0017. Epub 2012 Dec 4. Biosecur Bioterror. 2012. PMID: 23210832 Review.
-
The Emergency Use Authorization of Pharmaceuticals: History and Utility During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Pharmaceut Med. 2021 Jul;35(4):203-213. doi: 10.1007/s40290-021-00397-6. Epub 2021 Aug 28. Pharmaceut Med. 2021. PMID: 34453703 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Japan's Special Approval for Emergency System During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Mar;111(3):551-558. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2310. Epub 2021 Jun 18. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022. PMID: 34032279 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Remdesivir emergency approvals: a comparison of the U.S., Japanese, and EU systems.Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Oct;13(10):1095-1101. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2020.1821650. Epub 2020 Sep 29. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2020. PMID: 32909843 Review.
Cited by
-
Accelerating the approval of mpox vaccines based on lessons learnt from COVID-19 vaccines through the lens of regulatory science.BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Aug 14;10(8):e018517. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-018517. BMJ Glob Health. 2025. PMID: 40813101 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Strengthening Vaccine Regulation: Insights from COVID-19 Vaccines, Best Practices, and Lessons for Future Public Health Emergencies.Vaccines (Basel). 2025 Jun 12;13(6):638. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13060638. Vaccines (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40573969 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials