Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Jan 1:368:615-632.
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.09.055. Epub 2024 Sep 14.

Mechanisms of change in digital interventions for depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of six mediator domains

Affiliations
Free article
Meta-Analysis

Mechanisms of change in digital interventions for depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of six mediator domains

Florian Angerer et al. J Affect Disord. .
Free article

Abstract

Background: While the efficacy of digital interventions for the treatment of depression is well established, comprehensive knowledge on how therapeutic changes come about is still limited. This systematic review aimed to provide an overview of research on change mechanisms in digital interventions for depression and meta-analytically evaluate indirect effects of potential mediators.

Methods: The databases CENTRAL, Embase, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials investigating mediators of digital interventions for adults with depression. Two reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion, assessed study quality and categorized potential mediators. Indirect effects were synthesized with a two-stage structural equation modeling approach (TSSEM).

Results: Overall, 25 trials (8110 participants) investigating 84 potential mediators were identified, of which attentional (8 %), self-related (6 %), biophysiological (6 %), affective (5 %), socio-cultural (2 %) and motivational (1 %) variables were the scope of this study. TSSEM revealed significant mediation effects for combined self-related variables (ab = -0.098; 95 %-CI: [-0.150, -0.051]), combined biophysiological variables (ab = -0.073; 95 %-CI: [-0.119, -0.025]) and mindfulness (ab = -0.042; 95 %-CI: [-0.080, -0.015]). Meta-analytical evaluations of the other three domains were not feasible.

Limitations: Methodological shortcomings of the included studies, the considerable heterogeneity and the small number of investigated variables within domains limit the generalizability of the results.

Conclusion: The findings further the understanding of potential change mechanisms in digital interventions for depression and highlight recommendations for future process research, such as the consideration of temporal precedence and experimental manipulation of potential mediators, as well as the application of network approaches.

Keywords: Depression; Digital intervention; Mechanism of change; Mediator; Process research; Psychotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

LinkOut - more resources