Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 16;15(1):8119.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-51301-0.

N1-Methylpseudouridine and pseudouridine modifications modulate mRNA decoding during translation

Affiliations

N1-Methylpseudouridine and pseudouridine modifications modulate mRNA decoding during translation

Jeremy Monroe et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

The ribosome utilizes hydrogen bonding between mRNA codons and aminoacyl-tRNAs to ensure rapid and accurate protein production. Chemical modification of mRNA nucleobases can adjust the strength and pattern of this hydrogen bonding to alter protein synthesis. We investigate how the N1-methylpseudouridine (m1Ψ) modification, commonly incorporated into therapeutic and vaccine mRNA sequences, influences the speed and fidelity of translation. We find that m1Ψ does not substantially change the rate constants for amino acid addition by cognate tRNAs or termination by release factors. However, we also find that m1Ψ can subtly modulate the fidelity of amino acid incorporation in a codon-position and tRNA dependent manner in vitro and in human cells. Our computational modeling shows that altered energetics of mRNA:tRNA interactions largely account for the context dependence of the low levels of miscoding we observe on Ψ and m1Ψ containing codons. The outcome of translation on modified mRNA bases is thus governed by the sequence context in which they occur.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Cognate amino acid addition is modestly increased on UUm1Ѱ, but not m1Ѱ UU or Um1ѰU, codons.
A The chemical structures of the nucleobases we investigated. B The formation of fMet-Phe (MF) dipeptide as a function of time by E. coli ribosomes containing 35S-fMet-tRNAfMet bound to an AUG start codon in the P site, and unmodified (black circles – UUU, n = 23 reactions divided between 2 experiments) or modified (blue squares - m1ΨUU (n = 36 reactions conducted in 3 experiments), green diamonds - Um1ΨU (n = 45 reactions over 4 experiments), red triangles - UUm1Ψ (n = 44 reactions/3 experiments)) codons in the A site. C The K½ curve for RF1. Fitted kobs values (n = 12 independent measurements of kobs) for RF1-catalyzed 35S-fMet release on UAA (circles) or m1ΨAA (squares) are displayed as a function of [RF1]. D The K½ curve for RF2. Fitted kobs values (n = 11 independent measurements of kobs) for RF2-catalyzed 35S-fMet release on an UAA (black circles) or m1ΨAA (blue squares) are displayed as a function of [RF2]. Error bars in (C) and (D) indicate the standard error of the fitted value of kobs. Source data are provided as Source Data file.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. m1Ψ impacts amino acid selectivity in vitro and in HEK293 cells.
A Representative eTLC displaying dipeptide products from translation reactions performed with 70 S initiation complexes (ICs) containing an unmodified UUU or m1ΨUU codon in the A site and total E. coli tRNA aminoacylated with a single amino acid (aa-TC). Relative to ICs containing a UUU codon in the A site, higher levels of miscoded MI and MV dipeptide products and lower levels of MS were generated from m1ΨUU containing ICs. B Summary of amino acid substitutions observed by mass spectrometry in a luciferase peptide incorporated on m1Ψ-containing mRNAs translated in 293H cells (Supplementary Table 8). Source data are provided as Source Data file.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Ѱ and m1Ѱ impact the rates of the ribosome reacting with near-cognate tRNAs in a sequence context dependent manner.
Plots of dipeptide formation as a function of time (seconds). Miscoding reactions were performed with E. coli ICs containing 35S-fMet-tRNAfMet bound to an AUG start codon in the P site, and unmodified (black circles-UUU) or modified (blue squares-Ψ/m1ΨUU, green diamonds-UΨ/m1ΨU, red triangles-UUΨ/m1Ψ) codons in the A site. Purified ICs were reacted with TCs containing (A) Ile-tRNAIle(GAU), (B) Leu-tRNALeu(CAG)), or (C) Ser-tRNASer(UGA). At least 30 independent time points were collected for each IC in experiments conducted over three or more separate days. D The fitted rate constants (kobs) for isoleucine, leucine, and serine misincorporation on Ψ- and m1Ψ- modified codons relative to the fitted rate constants for isoleucine, leucine, and serine misincorporation on a UUU codon. Each ratio has an n of 1 (since each is computed by dividing kobs,modified/kobs,UUU) and error bars were calculated by propagating the 95% confidence intervals of each fitted rate constant. Source data are provided as Source Data file.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Changes in the energetics of mRNA:tRNA interactions correlate with observed differences in Phe and Ile incorporation on Ψ− and m1Ψ− containing codons.
A Summary of data in Supplementary Tables 4 and 5 displaying how a Ψ and m1Ψ impact the rate constants for the reaction of near-cognate tRNAs. B, C Summary of MM data. Gray bars reflect the change in energy for interactions between a modified mRNA position (Ψ/m1Ψ) and the base paring (B) tRNAPhe(GAA) or (C) tRNAIle(GAU) residue (ΔEbp) relative to an unmodified mRNA U. Black bars reflect the total change in energy (ΔEΣΨ/m1Ψ:X-Y) for interactions between a modified mRNA position (Ψ/m1Ψ) and three (B) tRNAPhe(GAA) or (C) tRNAIle(GAU) residues (the base paired nucleotide, and nucleotides 5′ and 3′ the bp) relative to an unmodified mRNA U. D Molecular model of an unmodified sequence coding for a Phe UUU codon and a tRNAIle(GAU). The hypermodification t6A37 is also shown on the tRNA.

References

    1. Frye, M., Jaffrey, S. R., Pan, T., Rechavi, G. & Suzuki, T. RNA modifications: what have we learned and where are we headed? Nat. Rev. Genet.17, 365–372 (2016). 10.1038/nrg.2016.47 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nachtergaele, S. & He, C. Chemical modifications in the life of an mRNA transcript. Annu Rev. Genet.52, 349–372 (2018). 10.1146/annurev-genet-120417-031522 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jackman, J. E. & Alfonzo, J. D. Transfer RNA modifications: nature’s combinatorial chemistry playground: transfer RNA modifications. WIREs RNA4, 35–48 (2013). 10.1002/wrna.1144 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jonkhout, N. et al. The RNA modification landscape in human disease. RNA23, 1754–1769 (2017). 10.1261/rna.063503.117 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sloan, K. E. et al. Tuning the ribosome: the influence of rRNA modification on eukaryotic ribosome biogenesis and function. RNA Biol.14, 1138–1152 (2017). 10.1080/15476286.2016.1259781 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources