Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Sep 2:4:1422466.
doi: 10.3389/fopht.2024.1422466. eCollection 2024.

Advances in the management of intraocular foreign bodies

Affiliations
Review

Advances in the management of intraocular foreign bodies

Marc Ohlhausen et al. Front Ophthalmol (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Intraocular foreign bodies (IOFBs) remain a severe complication of ocular trauma commonly encountered worldwide. This literature review aimed to discuss current practice patterns, areas of controversy, and advances in the management of IOFBs. Injuries involving IOFBs carry significant ocular morbidity and management can be extremely challenging. A systematic approach to preoperative evaluation and IOFB surgical management is detailed in this article and should be applied in each case. The location and composition of an IOFB have important implications on surgical approach and timing, especially in cases of toxic metals and vegetable matter. The advantages, disadvantages, and previous literature regarding immediate versus delayed foreign body removal are presented. Surgical approaches are described, with an emphasis on posterior chamber IOFB management and removal via pars plana vitrectomy. Final visual acuity is variable, but approaches have been used to prognosticate outcomes including the Ocular Trauma Score. By synthesizing current IOFB literature, the goal is to provide practitioners with guidance that will maximize the chances of surgical success and patient outcomes.

Keywords: endophthalmitis; intraocular foreign body; ocular trauma; open globe injury; vitrectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Intraocular foreign body (IOFB) management and decision-making algorithm.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Utilization of a temporary keratoprosthesis (TKP) during pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). (B) Intraocular foreign body (IOFB) being removed from under the edge of the TKP. Images courtesy of Drs. Grant Justin and Xi Chen.

References

    1. Mir TA, Canner JK, Zafar S, Srikumaran D, Friedman DS, Woreta FA. Characteristics of open globe injuries in the United States from 2006 to 2014. JAMA Ophthalmol. (2020) 138:268–75. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.5823 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yuan M, Lu Q. Trends and disparities in the incidence of intraocular foreign bodies 1990-2019: A global analysis. Front Public Health. (2022) 10:858455. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.858455 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Loporchio D, Mukkamala L, Gorukanti K, Zarbin M, Langer P, Bhagat N. Intraocular foreign bodies: A review. Surv Ophthalmol. (2016) 61:582–96. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2016.03.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Martín-Prieto S, Álvarez-Peregrina C, Thuissard-Vassallo I, Catalina-Romero C, Calvo-Bonacho E, Villa-Collar C, et al. . Eye injuries epidemiology description in a working population over 10 years in Spain. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2020) 17:4454. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124454 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen Q, Liang L, Shi Y, Lu F. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of open globe injuries in Southwest China. Front Med (Lausanne). (2024) 11:1303683. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1303683 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources