Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 1;97(1164):2015-2023.
doi: 10.1093/bjr/tqae191.

External validation of a deep learning model for automatic segmentation of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue on abdominal CT images

Collaborators, Affiliations

External validation of a deep learning model for automatic segmentation of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue on abdominal CT images

David P J van Dijk et al. Br J Radiol. .

Abstract

Objectives: Body composition assessment using CT images at the L3-level is increasingly applied in cancer research and has been shown to be strongly associated with long-term survival. Robust high-throughput automated segmentation is key to assess large patient cohorts and to support implementation of body composition analysis into routine clinical practice. We trained and externally validated a deep learning neural network (DLNN) to automatically segment L3-CT images.

Methods: Expert-drawn segmentations of visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue (VAT/SAT) and skeletal muscle (SM) of L3-CT-images of 3187 patients undergoing abdominal surgery were used to train a DLNN. The external validation cohort was comprised of 2535 patients with abdominal cancer. DLNN performance was evaluated with (geometric) dice similarity (DS) and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient.

Results: There was a strong concordance between automatic and manual segmentations with median DS for SM, VAT, and SAT of 0.97 (IQR: 0.95-0.98), 0.98 (IQR: 0.95-0.98), and 0.95 (IQR: 0.92-0.97), respectively. Concordance correlations were excellent: SM 0.964 (0.959-0.968), VAT 0.998 (0.998-0.998), and SAT 0.992 (0.991-0.993). Bland-Altman metrics indicated only small and clinically insignificant systematic offsets; SM radiodensity: 0.23 Hounsfield units (0.5%), SM: 1.26 cm2.m-2 (2.8%), VAT: -1.02 cm2.m-2 (1.7%), and SAT: 3.24 cm2.m-2 (4.6%).

Conclusion: A robustly-performing and independently externally validated DLNN for automated body composition analysis was developed.

Advances in knowledge: This DLNN was successfully trained and externally validated on several large patient cohorts. The trained algorithm could facilitate large-scale population studies and implementation of body composition analysis into clinical practice.

Keywords: CT; body composition; convolutional neural networks; deep learning; image segmentation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Segmentation of skeletal muscle (red), visceral adipose tissue (yellow), and subcutaneous adipose tissue (blue) on a single CT slice at the level of the third lumbar vertebra.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Distribution of geometric dice similarity (DS) on L3 slice for skeletal muscle (SM), subcutaneous fat (SAT), and visceral fat (VAT). (A) Box-whisker plot showing the median DS as the solid horizontal line and the interquartile range as the upper and lower limits of the box. The vertical line ends indicate 1%-tile and 99%-tile, and outliers outside this range are shown as individual dots. (B)-(D) show the distribution of DS as a function of SM area, VAT area, and SAT area, respectively.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Lin’s concordance correlation (CCC) plots. (A) Skeletal muscle attenuation (SMRA), (B) skeletal muscle index (SMI), (C) visceral fat index (VATI), and (D) subcutaneous fat index (SATI). The units of SMRA are Hounsfield unit (HU). The units of SMI, VATI, and SATI are all cm2.m−2. Reference values were defined as those extracted from human-drawn segmentations. Predicted values were extracted from DLNN-made segmentations. DLNN = deep learning neural network.

References

    1. Brown LR, Sousa MS, Yule MS, et al.; Cancer Cachexia Endpoints Working Group. Body weight and composition endpoints in cancer cachexia clinical trials: systematic review 4 of the cachexia endpoints series. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2024;15(3):816-852. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mourtzakis M, Prado CMM, Lieffers JR, Reiman T, McCargar LJ, Baracos VE.. A practical and precise approach to quantification of body composition in cancer patients using computed tomography images acquired during routine care. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2008;33(5):997-1006. - PubMed
    1. Martin L, Birdsell L, Macdonald N, et al.Cancer cachexia in the age of obesity: skeletal muscle depletion is a powerful prognostic factor, independent of body mass index. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(12):1539-1547. - PubMed
    1. van Dijk DP, Bakens MJ, Coolsen MMM, et al.Low skeletal muscle radiation attenuation and visceral adiposity are associated with overall survival and surgical site infections in patients with pancreatic cancer. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2017;8(2):317-326. - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Dijk DPJ, Zhao J, Kemter K, et al.Ectopic fat in liver and skeletal muscle is associated with shorter overall survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2021;12(4):983-992. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types