Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 13:95:536-544.
doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.41911.

Prognostic model development for risk of curve progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective cohort study of 127 patients

Collaborators, Affiliations

Prognostic model development for risk of curve progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective cohort study of 127 patients

Marlene Dufvenberg et al. Acta Orthop. .

Abstract

Background and purpose: The study's purpose was to develop and internally validate a prognostic survival model exploring baseline variables for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curve progression.

Methods: A longitudinal prognostic cohort analysis was performed on trial data (n = 135) including girls and boys, Cobb angle 25-40°, aged 9-17 years, remaining growth > 1 year, and previously untreated. Prognostic outcome was defined as curve progression of Cobb angle of > 6° prior to skeletal maturity. 34 candidate prognostic variables were tested. Time-to-event was measured with 6-month intervals. Cox proportional hazards regression survival model (CoxPH) was used for model development and validation in comparison with machine learning models (66.6/33.3 train/test data set). The models were adjusted for treatment exposure.

Results: The final primary prognostic model included 127 patients, predicting progress with acceptable discriminative ability (concordance = 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-0.86). Significant prognostic risk factors were Risser stage of 0 (HR 4.6, CI 2.1-10.1, P < 0.001), larger major curve Cobb angle (HRstandardized 1.5, CI 1.1-2.0, P = 0.005), and higher score on patient-reported pictorial Spinal Appearance Questionnaire (pSAQ) (HRstandardized 1.4, CI 1.0-1.9, P = 0.04). Treatment exposure, entered as a covariate adjustment, contributed significantly to the final model (HR 3.1, CI 1.5-6.0, P = 0.001). Sensitivity analysis displayed that CoxPH maintained acceptable discriminative ability (AUC 0.79, CI 0.65-0.93) in comparison with machine learning algorithms.

Conclusion: The prognostic model (Risser stage, Cobb angle, pSAQ, and menarche) predicted curve progression of > 6° Cobb angle with acceptable discriminative ability. Adding patient report of the pSAQ may be of clinical importance for the prognosis of curve progression.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Candidate independent prognostic variables were measured at baseline. Height and weight were used to calculate body mass index. Height and age were used to calculate 3 normalized standardized height variables. Event was no progress if Cobb angle was ≤ 6° on reaching skeletal maturity or progress if curve progression > 6° occurred prior to skeletal maturity. Skeletal maturity was reached at less than 1 cm of growth in body height over 6 months. Time-to-event was measured for each patient from baseline at the first visit at pre-specified intervals of 6 months until event. Adjustment for treatment exposure was Boston scoliosis night brace versus Scoliosis-specific exercise and Control with adequate self-mediated physical activity alone.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Enrollment of participants into the prognostic cohort survival analysis conducted within a randomized control trial (CONTRAIS) comparing 3 conservative treatments. From January 2013 through October 2018, 2,150 adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis were screened.

References

    1. Negrini S, Donzelli S, Aulisa A G, Czaprowski D, Schreiber S, de Mauroy J C, et al. 2016 SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2018; 13: 3-51. doi: 10.1186/s13013-017-0145-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Charalampidis A, Diarbakerli E, Dufvenberg M, Jalalpour K, Ohlin A, Ahl Aspberg A, et al. Nighttime bracing or exercise in moderate-grade adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7(1): e2352492. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.52492. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weinstein S L, Dolan L A, Wright J G, Dobbs M B. Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. N Engl J Med 2013; 369(16): 1512-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1307337. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dolan L A, Weinstein S L, Abel M F, Bosch P P, Dobbs M B, Farber T O, et al. Bracing in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Trial (BrAIST): development and validation of a prognostic model in untreated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using the simplified skeletal maturity system. Spine Deform 2019; 7(6): 890-8.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2019.01.011. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lonstein J E, Carlson J M. The prediction of curve progression in untreated idiopathic scoliosis during growth. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984; 66(7): 1061-71. PMID: 6480635. - PubMed