Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound Guidance in Transthoracic Needle Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 39287512
- DOI: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000811
Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound Guidance in Transthoracic Needle Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Purpose: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant studies to assess the diagnostic accuracy and safety outcomes of ultrasound (US)-guided transthoracic needle biopsy (TTNB) for peripheral lung and pleural lesions.
Materials and methods: A search was performed through Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central from inception up to September 23, 2022 for diagnostic accuracy studies reporting US-guided TTNB (Prospero registration: CRD42021225168). The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy, which was assessed by sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios (LR), and diagnostic odds ratio. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate inter-study heterogeneity. The secondary outcome was the frequency of complications. Random-effects models were used for the analyses. The risk of bias and the applicability of the included studies were assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Publication bias was assessed by testing the association between the natural logarithm of the diagnostic odds ratio and the effective sample size.
Results: Of the 7841 citations identified, 83 independent cohorts (11,767 patients) were included in the analysis. The pooled sensitivity of US-TTNB was 88% (95% CI: 86%-91%, 80 studies). Pooled specificity was 100% (95% CI: 99%-100%, 72 studies), resulting in positive LR, negative LR, and diagnostic odds ratio of 946 (-743 to 2635), 0.12 (0.09 to 0.14), and 8141 (1344 to 49,321), respectively. Complications occurred in 4% (95% CI: 3%-5%) of the procedures, with pneumothorax being the most frequent (3%; 95% CI: 2%-3%, 72 studies) and resulting in chest tube placement in 0.4% (95% CI: 0.2%-0.7%, 64 studies) of the procedures.
Conclusions: US-TTNB is an effective and safe procedure for pleural lesions and peripheral lung lesions.
Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Viale PH. The American Cancer Society’s facts & figures: 2020 edition. J Adv Pract Oncol. 2020;11:135–136.
-
- Rivera MP, Mehta AC, Wahidi MM. Establishing the diagnosis of lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2013;143(suppl):e142S–e165S.
-
- Postmus PE, Kerr KM, Oudkerk M, et al. Early and locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(suppl_4):iv1–iv21.
-
- Yang PC. Ultrasound-guided transthoracic biopsy of the chest. Radiol Clin North Am. 2000;38:323–343.
-
- Higgins J, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, version 62. Cochrane; 2021.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical