Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Oct;50(10):1647-1656.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07612-3. Epub 2024 Sep 17.

Pressure control plus spontaneous ventilation versus volume assist-control ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome. A randomised clinical trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Pressure control plus spontaneous ventilation versus volume assist-control ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome. A randomised clinical trial

Jean-Christophe M Richard et al. Intensive Care Med. 2024 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of a pressure-controlled strategy allowing non-synchronised unassisted spontaneous ventilation (PC-SV) to a conventional volume assist-control strategy (ACV) on the outcome of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Methods: Open-label randomised clinical trial in 22 intensive care units (ICU) in France. Seven hundred adults with moderate or severe ARDS (PaO2/FiO2 < 200 mmHg) were enrolled from February 2013 to October 2018. Patients were randomly assigned to PC-SV (n = 348) or ACV (n = 352) with similar objectives of tidal volume (6 mL/kg predicted body weight) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). Paralysis was stopped after 24 h and sedation adapted to favour patients' spontaneous ventilation. The primary endpoint was in-hospital death from any cause at day 60.

Results: Hospital mortality [34.6% vs 33.5%, p = 0.77, risk ratio (RR) = 1.03 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-1.27)], 28-day mortality, as well as the number of ventilator-free days and organ failure-free days at day 28 did not differ between PC-SV and ACV groups. Patients in the PC-SV group received significantly less sedation and neuro-muscular blocking agents than in the ACV group. A lower proportion of patients required adjunctive therapy of hypoxemia (including prone positioning) in the PC-SV group than in the ACV group [33.1% vs 41.3%, p = 0.03, RR = 0.80 (95% CI 0.66-0.98)]. The incidences of pneumothorax and refractory hypoxemia did not differ between the groups.

Conclusions: A strategy based on PC-SV mode that favours spontaneous ventilation reduced the need for sedation and adjunctive therapies of hypoxemia but did not significantly reduce mortality compared to ACV with similar tidal volume and PEEP levels.

Keywords: Acute respiratory distress syndrome; Mechanical ventilation; Neuro-muscular blocking agents; Pressure-controlled ventilation; Sedation; Spontaneous ventilation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare having no potential conflict of interest relevant to the present manuscript.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow of patients in the trial. ACV denotes volume assist-control ventilation strategy and PC-SV pressure-controlled strategy allowing non-synchronized unassisted spontaneous ventilation
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Probabilities of in-hospital death from the day of randomization (day 0) to day 60 in the volume assist-control ventilation strategy (ACV) and pressure-controlled strategy allowing non-synchronized unassisted spontaneous ventilation (PC-SV)

References

    1. Dianti J, Fard S, Wong J et al (2022) Strategies for lung- and diaphragm-protective ventilation in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a physiological trial. Crit Care Lond Engl 26:259. 10.1186/s13054-022-04123-9 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dres M, Dubé B-P, Mayaux J et al (2017) Coexistence and impact of limb muscle and diaphragm weakness at time of liberation from mechanical ventilation in medical intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 195:57–66. 10.1164/rccm.201602-0367OC - PubMed
    1. Goligher EC, Dres M, Patel BK et al (2020) Lung- and diaphragm-protective ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 202:950–961. 10.1164/rccm.202003-0655CP - PMC - PubMed
    1. Richard JCM, Lyazidi A, Akoumianaki E et al (2013) Potentially harmful effects of inspiratory synchronization during pressure preset ventilation. Intensive Care Med 39:2003–2010. 10.1007/s00134-013-3032-7 - PubMed
    1. Rittayamai N, Beloncle F, Goligher EC et al (2017) Effect of inspiratory synchronization during pressure-controlled ventilation on lung distension and inspiratory effort. Ann Intensive Care 7:100. 10.1186/s13613-017-0324-z - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources