Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Sep 17;19(9):e0308419.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308419. eCollection 2024.

Health care providers`attitude and associated factors to safe abortion in Ethiopia, 2023: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Health care providers`attitude and associated factors to safe abortion in Ethiopia, 2023: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Simachew Animen Bante et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: In sub-Saharan Africa, the number of maternal deaths due to unsafe abortions has been gradually rising. In Ethiopia, unplanned pregnancies contribute to 25% of births, accounting for 6%-9% of the maternal deaths resulting from unsafe abortions. Despite several disjointed cross-sectional studies that have been carried out in the past, there is no comprehensive data on the attitudes of healthcare practitioners and other related aspects regarding safe abortion in Ethiopia. This study attempted to measure pooled health care providers' attitudes and determinants of safe abortion in Ethiopia.

Methods: African Journals Online, Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, Science Direct, Hinari, and Google Scholar were the databases that were accessed. The studies were evaluated critically by using the Joanna Briggs Critical Appraisal methods. The study followed the recommendations set forth by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Data were extracted in an Excel spreadsheet and imported to STATA versions 17 software for meta-analysis. The random- effects model was used to pooled the health care providers' attitudes toward safe abortion. Heterogeneity between studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Q-test and I2 statistics (I squared statistics). To evaluate publication bias, egger's tests and funnel plots were employed. Forest plot was used to present the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval.

Results: In this review and meta-analysis, a total of eight papers with a 2,826 sample size were considered. Overall, 65.49% of Ethiopian health care professionals had a positive attitude towards safe abortion (95%CI: 49.64, 81.34; I2 = 99.20%, P = 0.000). Knowledge of the abortion law (OR = 2.25, 95% CI: 1.06, 3.43), being a male provider (OR = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.23, 2.54), receiving training on abortion (OR = 2.91, 95% CI: 1.17, 4.65), working as a midwife (OR = 3.029, 95% CI: 1.605, 4.453) and practicing abortion procedures (OR = 2.55, 95% CI: 1.32, 3.78) were positively associated with the attitudes of the providers regarding safe abortion in Ethiopia.

Conclusion: In Ethiopia, there was a low pooled prevalence of positive attitude towards safe abortion. Safe abortion services in Ethiopia are more likely to be viewed favorably by health care professionals who have received abortion service training and are familiar with abortion laws. As a result, it is imperative that all healthcare facilities and other relevant parties ensure that health professionals receive training on safe abortion services and are aware of Ethiopia's abortion laws.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There is no any competing interest.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flow chart for study of health care providers’ attitude and associated factors to safe abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis in Ethiopia, 2023.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Forest funnel plot of the pooled providers’ favorable attitude to safe abortion in Ethiopia, 2023.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Funnel plot to test publication bias of eight studies, 2023.

Similar articles

References

    1. Organization W.H., Clinical practice handbook for safe abortion. 2014: World Health Organization. - PubMed
    1. Singh S., Sedgh G., and Hussain R., Unintended pregnancy: worldwide levels, trends, and outcomes. Studies in family planning, 2010. 41(4): p. 241–250. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2010.00250.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grimes D.A., et al.., Unsafe abortion: the preventable pandemic. The lancet, 2006. 368(9550): p. 1908–1919. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69481-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Singh S. and Maddow‐Zimet I., Facility‐based treatment for medical complications resulting from unsafe pregnancy termination in the developing world, 2012: a review of evidence from 26 countries. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2016. 123(9): p. 1489–1498. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13552 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Demographic E., Health survey (EDHS) 2016: key indicators report, central statistical agency Addis Ababa, Ethiopia . The DHS Program ICF Rockville, Maryland, USA, 2016.

MeSH terms