Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2024 Sep 17;28(1):307.
doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05075-y.

Lung ultrasound and ARDS: global collaboration is the way to go

Affiliations
Comment

Lung ultrasound and ARDS: global collaboration is the way to go

Marry R Smit et al. Crit Care. .

Abstract

We would like to extend our gratitude to Dr. da Hora Passos et al. for their interest in our recently published review and meta-analysis in Critical Care. In this response, we will elaborate on the points raised by the authors. We agree with the authors that LUS, like any other diagnostic technique, is valuable and safe only when utilized by trained operators. The authors expressed uncertainty regarding the sensitivity of LUS in detecting mild ARDS or ARDS at an early stage. This variance in sensitivity is more likely due to diversity in diagnostic thresholds. We advocate for global collaboration among LUS experts to align LUS methodologies and strengthen the evidence supporting LUS in the diagnosis of ARDS and its morphological subphenotypes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Comment on

References

    1. Passos DH, da Cunha Lyrio R, Lourenço RM, de Almeida Figueiredo ID, Flato UA, Barbas CV, da Silva AA. Lus me up: elevating Ards diagnosis. Crit Care. 2024. 10.1186/s13054-024-05044-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boumans MM, Aerts W, Pisani L, Bos LD, Smit MR, Tuinman PR. Diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound in diagnosis of Ards and identification of focal or non-focal ARDS subphenotypes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2024. 10.1186/s13054-024-04985-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Winkler MH, Touw HR, van de Ven PM, Twisk J, Tuinman PR. Diagnostic accuracy of chest radiograph, and when concomitantly studied lung ultrasound, in critically ill patients with respiratory symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2018. 10.1097/ccm.0000000000003129. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smit MR, Hagens LA, Heijnen NF, Pisani L, Cherpanath TG, Dongelmans DA, de Grooth H-JS, Pierrakos C, Tuinman PR, Zimatore C, Paulus F, Schnabel RM, Schultz MJ, Bergmans DC, Bos LD, Bos LD, Hagens LA, Schultz MJ, Smit MR, Verschueren AR. Lung ultrasound prediction model for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a multicenter prospective observational study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023;207(12):1591–601. 10.1164/rccm.202210-1882oc. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baid H, Vempalli N, Kumar S, Arora P, Walia R, Chauhan U, Shukla K, Verma A, Chawang H, Agarwal D. Point of care ultrasound as initial diagnostic tool in acute dyspnea patients in the Emergency Department of a Tertiary Care Center: diagnostic accuracy study. Int J Emerg Med. 2022. 10.1186/s12245-022-00430-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources