Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Sep 17.
doi: 10.1111/bjh.19682. Online ahead of print.

A critical review of management of allogeneic transplant-eligible adults with Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

Affiliations
Review

A critical review of management of allogeneic transplant-eligible adults with Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

Naranie Shanmuganathan et al. Br J Haematol. .

Abstract

Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) in 20%-30% of adult patients contains the Philadelphia (Ph+) chromosome. Historically, Ph+ ALL denoted a markedly inferior outcome and long-term survival in the absence of an allograft was uncommon. However, the advent of targeted therapy directed against the BCR::ABL1 fusion protein with various tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has markedly improved the prognosis, resulting in a number of treatment controversies in allograft-eligible patients. Which is the best TKI to use in induction? What is the clinical relevance of the subdivision of Ph+ ALL into multilineage vs lymphoid types? Do all patients in first morphological complete remission (CR1) after induction and consolidation with chemotherapy/TKI require an allograft? If not, what risk factors predict a poor outcome without an allograft? Can chemotherapy-free approaches, such as blinatumomab in conjunction with more potent TKIs, obviate the need for an allograft in high-risk patients? What is the best strategy to deal with persistent or emerging minimal residual disease both pre- and post-transplant? Is maintenance TKI indicated in all patients post allograft? Can salvage therapy and a subsequent allograft cure patients who relapse after not being transplanted in CR1? This manuscript reviews the latest data influencing contemporary management and discusses these controversies.

Keywords: BCR::ABL1; MRD; acute leukaemia; stem cell transplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Foà R, Chiaretti S. Philadelphia chromosome–positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(25):2399–2411.
    1. Chiaretti S, Vitale A, Cazzaniga G, Orlando SM, Silvestri D, Fazi P, et al. Clinico‐biological features of 5202 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia enrolled in the Italian AIEOP and GIMEMA protocols and stratified in age cohorts. Haematologica. 2013;98(11):1702–1710.
    1. Thomas X, Boiron JM, Huguet F, Dombret H, Bradstock K, Vey N, et al. Outcome of treatment in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: analysis of the LALA‐94 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(20):4075–4086.
    1. Ghobadi A, Slade M, Kantarjian H, Alvarenga J, Aldoss I, Mohammed KA, et al. The role of allogeneic transplant for adult Ph+ ALL in CR1 with complete molecular remission: a retrospective analysis. Blood. 2022;140(20):2101–2112.
    1. Zuna J, Hovorkova L, Krotka J, Koehrmann A, Bardini M, Winkowska L, et al. Minimal residual disease in BCR::ABL1‐positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: different significance in typical ALL and in CML‐like disease. Leukemia. 2022;36(12):2793–2801.

LinkOut - more resources