Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 4:76:102817.
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102817. eCollection 2024 Oct.

Local anaesthetic to reduce injection pain in patients who are prescribed intramuscular benzathine penicillin G: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations

Local anaesthetic to reduce injection pain in patients who are prescribed intramuscular benzathine penicillin G: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ferruccio Pelone et al. EClinicalMedicine. .

Abstract

Background: Three to 4-weekly intramuscular injections of benzathine penicillin G (BPG) for a prolonged period (e.g., 10 years, until age 40 years, or lifelong) are recommended for preventing group A streptococcal infections that cause recurrent acute rheumatic fever (ARF) and potential progression to rheumatic heart disease (RHD). The duration of treatment, frequency and local pain associated with BPG injections may lead to reduced compliance. Shorter courses of BPG are recommended for the treatment of syphilis and Streptococcal infections. We aimed to assess the effects of local anaesthesia in reducing injection pain in patients who are being treated with BPG.

Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science and LILACS from database inception up to May 4, 2024, and performed additional searches for grey literature. Randomised controlled trials comparing BPG vs. BPG administered alongside local anaesthetics were included. Randomized controlled trials using BPG, irrespectively of indication, and testing any local anaesthetic agent for pain alleviation were considered eligible. We applied GRADE to assess the quality of evidence. Summary data were extracted from included trials. The primary outcome was injection pain, assessed through mean differences. A random-effects model was utilized to account for study heterogeneity. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022342437.

Findings: Database searches identified a total of 3958 records, and 3 additional records were retrieved from grey literature searches. After removal of duplicates, screening of abstracts and full-text review, eight trials were included, combining a total of 489 patients (151 patients with RHD). Immediate pain level, as reported by patients, was of high intensity in most studies. Low intensity pain was still reported at 24 h. Administration of lidocaine mixed with BPG was associated with a significant reduction in immediate post-injection pain (mean difference -3.84, 95% confidence interval -6.19 to -1.48, P = 0.0001; 4 studies; I2 = 98%; GRADE: moderate quality), pain at 5 min (mean difference -2.85, 95% CI confidence interval -3.78 to -1.92, P < 0.0001; 1 study; GRADE: moderate quality), and pain at 20 min (mean difference -1.85, 95% confidence interval -2.61 to -1.09, P < 0.0001; 1 study; GRADE: moderate quality) on a 1 to 10 scale. One study assessed lidocaine cream applied to the skin prior to BPG injection and showed no significant reduction in injection pain (mean difference = -0.54, 95% CI confidence interval -1.17 to 0.09, P = 0.13; 1 study; GRADE: low quality). Mepivacaine mixed with BPG in patients with syphilis showed a significant reduction of immediate post-injection pain (mean difference -2.19, 95% CI confidence interval -2.49 to -1.89, P < 0.0001; 1 study; GRADE: moderate quality). Two studies assessed procaine mixed with BPG and reported: lower immediate pain levels or pain assessed at 1 h (mean difference and 95% CI confidence intervals not provided, P = 0.001 and P = 0.008, respectively; 1 study; GRADE: low quality), or less immediate pain and pain at 24 h on the buttock injected with procaine mixed with BPG (mean difference and 95% CI confidence intervals not provided, P < 0.001 for both; 1 study; Grade: low quality). No severe adverse reactions were reported.

Interpretation: In patients receiving intramuscular BPG injections, moderate quality quantitative evidence suggests that BPG injections diluted with lidocaine or mepivacaine may improve post-injection pain scores compared to BPG injections diluted with sterile water. Procaine may also have a benefit, but quality of evidence was lower. Most studies included small patient samples and assessed pain levels at different timepoints. Due to insufficient data we were not able to assess the impact of injection volume, and local anaesthetics' dose on pain intensity and duration of pain relief.

Funding: WHO.

Keywords: Impetigo; Lidocaine; Rheumatic; Streptococcal pharyngitis; Syphilis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flowchart. Legend: RCT—randomised controlled trial.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Left Panel. Forest-plots with pooling of data on intramuscular lidocaine; Right Panel—Risk of Bias assessment of included trials. Legend: SD—standard deviation; CI—confidence interval; IV—inverse variance.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Time-dependent effect (mean difference with 95% CI confidence intervals) of Lidocaine (left) and Mepivacaine on pain post-intramuscular BPG injection. Legend: BPG - benzathine penicillin G; N—number of patients; A - Amir J et al. 1998; J—Jiamton S et al., 2022; M− Morsy MM et al. 2012; T—Tamondong RM et al. 2018; E—Estrada V et al. 2019.

References

    1. Sika-Paotonu D., Beaton A., Raghu A., Steer A., Carapetis J. In: Streptococcus pyogenes: basic biology to clinical manifestations. Ferretti J.J., Stevens D.L., Fischetti V.A., editors. University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center; Oklahoma City (OK): 2016. Acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK425394/ Available from:
    1. Beaton A., Okello E., Rwebembera J., et al. Secondary antibiotic prophylaxis for latent rheumatic heart disease. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:230–240. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2102074. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organisation . WHO Technical Report Series; Geneva: 2004. Rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease: report of a WHO expert consultation, Geneva, 29 October–1 November 2001.https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/42898/WHO_TRS_923.pdf?sequen... Available from:
    1. Ralph A.P., de Dassel J.L., Kirby A., et al. Improving delivery of secondary prophylaxis for rheumatic heart disease in a high-burden setting: outcome of a stepped-wedge, community, randomised trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7 doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009308. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Manyemba J., Mayosi B.M. Penicillin for secondary prevention of rheumatic fever. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;3 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002227. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources