The status quo and influencing factors of clinical research nurses' participation in preoperative blood sampling in patients with pulmonary nodules
- PMID: 39291219
- PMCID: PMC11403984
- DOI: 10.1177/17449871241246971
The status quo and influencing factors of clinical research nurses' participation in preoperative blood sampling in patients with pulmonary nodules
Abstract
Background: Under-recruitment in clinical trials has become a worldwide problem, and has many causes that need to be understood. Clinical Research Nurses (CRNs) provide a new research perspective.
Aim: To understand the current situation about the informed consent rate after the participation of CRNs and analyse the possible influencing factors.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at a hospital. A convenience sample was used to study patients with pulmonary nodules who underwent day surgery from March to May 2023. Patients first received information from doctors and a second session by CRNs was provided for those who initially were hesitant about the research. A questionnaire survey was conducted using an online survey platform to collect information.
Results: After education by doctors, 208 patients were hesitant and CRNs conducted a second education session, the CICARE model was used for communication. Following this session a further 161 patients were willing to participate. Finally, 374 patients were willing to participate. Related factors include age, education level and the attitude of self-assessed family members towards their participation in clinical projects.
Conclusions: CRNs' participation can improve patients' willingness to participate. It is crucial to pay attention to the role of CRNs and propose a new model of CRNs involvement in clinical research based on identifying factors.
Keywords: clinical research nurses; medical research hospital; patient participation; pulmonary nodule patients.
© The Author(s) 2024.
Conflict of interest statement
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Similar articles
-
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training.2024 Mar 29. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2024 Mar 29. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 36508513 Free Books & Documents.
-
Feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy for women and healthcare professionals: the LAVA trial qualitative process evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul 23:1-21. doi: 10.3310/GJTC1325. Online ahead of print. Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul 23:1-21. doi: 10.3310/GJTC1325. Online ahead of print. PMID: 40717555
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 12065068
-
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016. PMID: 27532314
-
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280. Health Technol Assess. 2008. PMID: 18547499
References
-
- Bai HH, Li J, Cheng XQ. (2022) Considerations of biological sample collection in early clinical trials. Chinese Journal of New Drugs 31: 1613–1615.
-
- Brown P, Hewison A, Newham R. (2019) What are research nurses’ experiences of obtaining consent from or for patients participating in emergency care research? A qualitative review. Journal of Clinical Nursing 28:4155-4165. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources