Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov;20(11):7698-7714.
doi: 10.1002/alz.14230. Epub 2024 Sep 18.

Plasma miRNAs across the Alzheimer's disease continuum: Relationship to central biomarkers

Affiliations

Plasma miRNAs across the Alzheimer's disease continuum: Relationship to central biomarkers

Shiwei Liu et al. Alzheimers Dement. 2024 Nov.

Abstract

Introduction: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play important roles in gene expression regulation and Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathogenesis.

Methods: We investigated the association between baseline plasma miRNAs and central AD biomarkers from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI; N = 803): amyloid, tau, and neurodegeneration (A/T/N). Differentially expressed miRNAs and their targets were identified, followed by pathway enrichment analysis. Machine learning approaches were applied to investigate the role of miRNAs as blood biomarkers.

Results: We identified nine, two, and eight miRNAs significantly associated with A/T/N positivity, respectively. We identified 271 genes targeted by amyloid-related miRNAs with estrogen signaling receptor-mediated signaling among the enriched pathways. Additionally, 220 genes targeted by neurodegeneration-related miRNAs showed enrichment in pathways including the insulin growth factor 1 pathway. The classification performance of demographic information for A/T/N positivity was increased up to 9% with the inclusion of miRNAs.

Discussion: Plasma miRNAs were associated with central A/T/N biomarkers, highlighting their potential as blood biomarkers.

Highlights: We performed association analysis of microRNAs (miRNAs) with amyloid/tau/neurodegeneration (A/T/N) biomarker positivity. We identified dysregulated miRNAs for A/T/N biomarker positivity. We identified Alzheimer's disease biomarker-specific/common pathways related to miRNAs. miRNAs improved the classification for A/T/N positivity by up to 9%. Our study highlights the potential of miRNAs as blood biomarkers.

Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; amyloid; biomarkers; classification; microRNAs; neurodegeneration; plasma; tau.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Saykin receives support from multiple NIH grants (P30 AG010133, P30 AG072976, R01 AG019771, R01 AG057739, U19 AG024904, R01 LM013463, R01 AG068193, T32 AG071444, U01 AG068057, U01 AG072177, and U19 AG074879). He has also received support from Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, a subsidiary of Eli Lilly (in kind contribution of PET tracer precursor) and participated on scientific advisory boards (Bayer Oncology, Eisai, Novo Nordisk, and Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.) and an observational study monitoring board (MESA, NIH NHLBI), as well as external advisory committees for multiple NIA grants. He also serves as editor‐in‐chief of Brain Imaging and Behavior, a Springer‐Nature Journal. Dr. Shannon Risacher served as Communications Chair, unpaid, for the Alzheimer's Association AWARE PIA, as well as received travel funding for the Charleston Conference on Alzheimer's Disease. She also has equity interest in Eli Lilly (< $10000), a company that may potentially benefit in the research results of this study. Dr. Shiwei Liu, Dr. Thea Rosewood, Dr. Kwangsik Nho, Ms. Soumilee Chaudhuri, Ms. Min Young Cho, Dr. Yen‐Ning Huang, Dr. Tamina Park have no interests to declare. The funders had no role in the study's design, the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data, the writing of the manuscript, or the decision to publish the results. Author disclosures are available in the supporting information.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Workflow of miRNA‐seq analysis with detailed tools and databases. A, amyloid; miRNA‐seq, microRNA sequencing; N, neurodegeneration; qPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction; T, tau.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Volcano and Venn plots of miRNAs related to the A/T/N biomarkers. A, Volcano plot for miRNAs identified related to the A biomarker. B, Volcano plot for miRNAs identified related to the T biomarker. C, Volcano plot for miRNAs identified related to the N biomarker (hsa‐miR‐1180‐3p has an adjusted p value smaller than smallest floating‐point value in R, so its adjusted p value is displayed as its closest adjusted p value listed [3.44E‐14]). Note: miRNAs with a baseMean < 10 are not shown in the volcano plot; red colored dots represent miRNAs with an absolute value of log2FC ≥ 0.26 and adjusted p value < 0.05; blue colored dots represent miRNAs with an adjusted p value < 0.05; green colored dots represent miRNAs with an absolute value of log2FC ≥ 0.26; gray colored dots indicate miRNAs that failed to pass these conditions. D, Venn plots of significant miRNAs detected in the three A/T/N biomarker groups. A, amyloid; log2FC, log2 fold change; miRNA‐seq, microRNA sequencing; N, neurodegeneration; T, tau.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Comparison of log2 fold change and p values of significant miRNAs across the A/T/N biomarkers. Note: * indicates 0.01 ≤ adjusted p value < 0.05; ** indicates 0.001 ≤ adjusted p value < 0.01; *** indicates adjusted p value < 0.001. Red stars indicate the absolute value of log2FC ≥ 0.26 and adjusted p value < 0.05. A, amyloid; log2FC, log2 fold change; miRNA‐seq, microRNA sequencing; N, neurodegeneration; T, tau.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
MiRNA target gene network. The interaction networks were constructed using target genes of miRNAs significantly associated with either A positivity (A) or N positivity (B). MiRNAs highlighted in red indicate upregulation, while those in blue represent downregulation. The orange or purple solid line denotes miRNA‐target interactions predicted by both miRTarBase and TarBase, whereas the green dashed line represents protein–protein interactions sourced from STRING. The border color of target genes corresponds to the number of interactions: yellow for three interactions, orange for four interactions, green for five interactions, and red for six interactions. The network was constructed by the Cytoscape software. miRNA, micro RNA.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Pathway enrichment network. Top 20 clusters of enriched terms in Metascape were generated using target genes predicted by miRNAs significantly associated in A positivity (A) and N positivity (B). The color indicates their cluster ID, while the thickness of the edge reflects the similarity score. The 28 nodes with red borders represent terms that are enriched in both A and N positivity. A, amyloid; N, neurodegeneration.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Classification performance of the A/T/N biomarker positivity using the random forest machine learning algorithm. A, The ROC‐AUC curves of classification for amyloid positivity; (B) the ROC‐AUC curves of classification for tau positivity; (C) the ROC‐AUC curves of classification for neurodegeneration positivity. Note: The dark blue curve indicates the mean AUC curve from 5‐fold cross‐validation tests and the background curves indicate the ROC curve for each cross‐validation fold, while the gray shade indicates the standard deviation of the mean ROC curve; and (D) mean and standard deviation for the performance metrics based on different combinations of features, computed across three independent runs of 5‐fold cross‐validation. “miRNAs in the Model Features” indicates including all miRNAs in the analysis; “DE miRNAs in the Model Features” indicates including differentially expressed miRNAs for each biomarker in the analysis, respectively. A, amyloid; AUC, area under the curve; miRNA, micro RNA; N, neurodegeneration; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; T, tau.

References

    1. Atri A. The Alzheimer's disease clinical spectrum: diagnosis and management. Med Clin North Am. 2019;103(2):263‐293. doi:10.1016/j.mcna.2018.10.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Prince M, Bryce R, Albanese E, Wimo A, Ribeiro W, Ferri CP. The global prevalence of dementia: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9(1):63‐75. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2012.11.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Scheltens P, Blennow K, Breteler MM, et al. Alzheimer's disease. Lancet. 2016;388(10043):505‐517. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01124-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. DeTure MA, Dickson DW. The neuropathological diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Mol Neurodegener. 2019;14(1):32. doi:10.1186/s13024-019-0333-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jack CR Jr, Bennett DA, Blennow K, et al. A/T/N: an unbiased descriptive classification scheme for Alzheimer disease biomarkers. Neurology. 2016;87(5):539‐547. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000002923 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Grants and funding