Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov;144(11):4827-4838.
doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05569-y. Epub 2024 Sep 19.

Does patient-specific instrument or robot improve imaging and functional outcomes in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? A bayesian analysis

Affiliations

Does patient-specific instrument or robot improve imaging and functional outcomes in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? A bayesian analysis

Xufeng Jiao et al. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Nov.

Abstract

Introduction: This study conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the imaging and functional outcomes of patient-specific instrument-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (P-UKA), robot-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (R-UKA), and conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (C-UKA).

Materials and methods: A comprehensive search was performed on five electronic databases and major orthopedic journals as of September 24, 2023. We included randomized controlled studies featuring at least two interventions of P-UKA, R-UKA, or C-UKA. Primary outcomes encompassed the deviation angle of hip-knee-ankle angle, as well as the coronal and sagittal plane alignment of femoral and tibial components. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported outcome measures (PROM), surgery time, revision rate, and complication rate. Bayesian framework was employed for risk ratio (RR) or mean deviation (MD) analysis, and treatment hierarchy was established based on rank probabilities.

Results: This NMA included 871 knees from 12 selected studies. In sagittal plane, R-UKA exhibited a significantly reduced deviation angle of femoral component compared to P-UKA (MD: 4.16, 95% CI: 0.21, 8.07), and of tibial component in comparison to C-UKA (MD: -2.45, 95% CI: -4.20, -0.68). Notably, the surgery time was significantly longer in R-UKA than in C-UKA (MD: 15.98, 95% CI: 3.11, 28.88). However, no significant differences were observed in other outcomes.

Conclusion: Compared with P-UKA or C-UKA, R-UKA significantly improves the femoral and tibial component alignment in the sagittal plane, although this does not translate into discernible differences in functional outcomes. Comprehensive considerations of economic and learning costs are imperative for the judicious selection of the appropriate procedure.

Keywords: Bayesian analysis; Patient-specific instrument; Robot; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. PROSPERO registered ID: CRD42023468418. Conflict of interest: No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. GBD 2015 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators (2016) Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of Disease Study 2015[J]. Lancet 388(10053):1545–1602 - DOI
    1. CUI A, LI H, WANG D et al (2020) Global, regional prevalence, incidence and risk factors of knee osteoarthritis in population-based studies[J]. EClinicalMedicine, 29–30: 100587
    1. WILSON HA, MIDDLETON R, ABRAM S et al (2019) Patient relevant outcomes of unicompartmental versus total knee replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BMJ 364:l352 - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. KAZARIAN G S, BARRACK T N OKAFORL et al (2020) High prevalence of Radiographic outliers and revisions with unicompartmental knee Arthroplasty[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am 102(13):1151–1159 - PubMed - DOI
    1. JONES G G, CLARKE S, JAERE M et al (2018) 3D printing and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. EFORT Open Rev 3(5):248–253 - PubMed - DOI

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources