Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Sep 18;24(1):1105.
doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04898-z.

Guided biofilm therapy versus conventional protocol-clinical outcomes in non-surgical periodontal therapy

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Guided biofilm therapy versus conventional protocol-clinical outcomes in non-surgical periodontal therapy

Miriam Cyris et al. BMC Oral Health. .

Abstract

Background: The aim of the randomized controlled clinical trial study was to evaluate the effectiveness in reducing pathologically increased pocket probing depths (PPD > 3 mm) using the Guided Biofilm Therapy (GBT) protocol (adapted to the clinical conditions in non-surgical periodontal therapy (NSPT): staining, air-polishing, ultrasonic scaler, air-polishing) compared to conventional instrumentation (staining, hand curettes/sonic scaler, polishing with rotary instruments) both by less experienced practitioners (dental students).

Methods: All patients were treated according to a split-mouth design under supervision as diseased teeth of quadrants I/III and II/IV randomly assigned to GBT or conventional treatment. In addition to the treatment time, periodontal parameters such as PPD and bleeding on probing (BOP) before NSPT (T0) and after NSPT (T1: 5 ± 2 months after T0) were documented by two calibrated and blinded examiners (Ethics vote/ Trial-register: Kiel-D509-18/ DRKS00026041).

Results: Data of 60 patients were analyzed (stage III/IV: n = 36/ n = 24; grade A/ B/ C: n = 1/ n = 31/ n = 28). At T1, a PPD reduction of all diseased tooth surfaces was observed in 57.0% of the GBT group and 58.7% of the control group (p = 0.067). The target endpoint (PPD ≤ 4 mm without BOP) was achieved in 11.5% for GBT (conventional treatment: 11.2%; p = 0.714). With the exception for number of sites with BOP, which was at T1 15.9% in the GBT group and 14.3% in the control group (p < 0.05) no significant differences between the outcomes of the study were found. At 30.3(28.3) min, the treatment time was significantly shorter in GBT than in the control group at 34.6(24.5) min (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: With both protocols (GBT/ conventional instrumentation) comparably good clinical treatment results can be achieve in NSPT in stage III-IV periodontitis patients.

Trial registration: The study was registered before the start of the study and can be found under the number DRKS00026041 in the German Clinical Trials Register. The registration date was 19/08/2021.

Keywords: Biofilm; Dental polishing; Erythritol; Non-surgical therapy; Periodontitis; Scaling and root planing; Subgingival scaling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Author M. Cyris declares that she has no competing interests. Author J. Festerling declares that she has no competing interests. Author M. Kahl declares that she has no competing interests. Author C. Springer declares that she has no competing interests. Author C.E. Dörfer declares that he has already given lectures on GBT as an honorary activity, but the investigations within the scope of this study were not influenced by this. Author G. Graetz declares that he has already given lectures on GBT as an honorary activity, but the investigations within the scope of this study were not influenced by this.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Treatment protocol of quadrants according the test (GBT) and control side (conventional). Legend: GBT: Guided Biofilm Therapy; NSPT: Non-surgical periodontal therapy; PPD: pocket probing depth; RDA: relative dentine abrasion
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flowchart of the patients’ recruitment and treatment protocol during the study. Legend: T0: baseline visit, T1: reevaluation 5 ± 2 months at the end of treatment phase of nonsurgical periodontitis therapy (NSPT), either quadrant treatment with ultrasonic scaler and air-polishing device (GBT) or quadrant treatment with conventional method such as curettes, air scaler and rotary polish (control)

References

    1. Goodson JM, et al. Control of periodontal infections: a randomized controlled trial I. The primary outcome attachment gain and pocket depth reduction at treated sites. J Clin Periodontol. 2012;39(6):526–36. - PubMed
    1. Vinel A, et al. Non-surgical Periodontal Treatment: SRP and Innovative Therapeutic Approaches. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2022;1373:303–27. - PubMed
    1. Sculean A, et al. A paradigm shift in mechanical biofilm management? Subgingival air polishing: a new way to improve mechanical biofilm management in the dental practice. Quintessence Int. 2013;44(7):475–7. - PubMed
    1. Hagi TT, et al. The effects of erythritol air-polishing powder on microbiologic and clinical outcomes during supportive periodontal therapy: Six-month results of a randomized controlled clinical trial. Quintessence Int. 2015;46(1):31–41. - PubMed
    1. Muller N, et al. Subgingival air-polishing with erythritol during periodontal maintenance: randomized clinical trial of twelve months. J Clin Periodontol. 2014;41(9):883–9. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources