Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 18;22(1):127.
doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01184-w.

Qualitative assessment of evidence-informed adolescent mental health policymaking in India: insights from project SAMA

Alice Ivory  1 , Mutharaju Arelingaiah  2 , Navaneetham Janardhana  2 , Poornima Bhola  3 , Siobhan Hugh-Jones  4 , Tolib Mirzoev  5
Affiliations

Qualitative assessment of evidence-informed adolescent mental health policymaking in India: insights from project SAMA

Alice Ivory et al. Health Res Policy Syst. .

Abstract

Background: The importance of evidence-informed health policymaking is widely recognized. However, many low- and middle-income countries lack evidence-informed mental health policies due to insufficient data, stigma or lack of resources. Various policies address adolescent mental health in India, but published knowledge on their evidence-informed nature is limited. In this paper, we report results of our analysis of the role of evidence in adolescent mental health policymaking in India.

Methods: This paper reports findings from the document analysis of key policy documentation (n = 10) and in-depth interviews with policy actors including policymakers, researchers, practitioners and intermediaries (n = 13). Framework analysis was used, informed by the components of a conceptual framework adapted from the literature: actors, policy and evidence processes, nature of evidence itself and contextual influences.

Results: Results show that adolescent mental health policies in India were generally evidence-informed, with more key evidence becoming generally available from 2010 onwards. Both formal and informal evidence informed mental health policies, particularly agenda-setting and policy development. Mental health policymaking in India is deemed important yet relatively neglected due to competing policy priorities and structural barriers such as stigma. Use of evidence in mental health policymaking reflected differing values, interests, relative powers and ideologies of policy actors. Involvement of government officials in evidence generation often resulted in successful evidence uptake in policy decisions. Policy actors often favoured formal and quantitative evidence, with a tendency to accept global evidence that aligns with personal values.

Conclusions: There is a need to ensure a balanced and complementary combination of formal and informal evidence for policy decisions. Evidence generation, dissemination and use for policy processes should recognize evidence preferences by key stakeholders, while prioritizing locally available evidence where possible. To help this, a balanced involvement of policy actors can ensure complementary perspectives in evidence production and policy agendas. This continued generation and promotion of evidence can also help reduce societal stigma around mental health and promote mental health as a key policy priority.

Keywords: Adolescent mental health; Asia low- and middle-income countries; Evidence-informed policy; Health policy; India.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Conceptual framework for understanding role of evidence in mental health policymaking (Mirzoev et al. 2017)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Timeline of critical evidential influences within mental health policymaking in India
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Cooper B. Evidence-based mental health policy: acritical appraisal. Br J Psychiatry. 2003;183(2):105–13. - PubMed
    1. Dobrow MJ, Goel V, Upshur REG. Evidence-based health policy: context and utilisation. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58(1):207–17. - PubMed
    1. Gadsby EW, Green A. A framework for evidence-informed health policy-making. 2007;
    1. Mirzoev T, Poudel AN, Gissing S, Doan TTD, Ferdous T, Regmi S, et al. Is evidence-informed urban health planning a myth or reality? Lessons from a qualitative assessment in three Asian cities. Health Policy Plan. 2019;34(10):773–83. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mirzoev T, Das M, Ebenso B, Uzochukwu B, Rawat B, Blok L, et al. Contextual influences on the role of evidence in health policy development: what can we learn from six policies in India and Nigeria? Evid Policy. 2017;13(1):59–79.

LinkOut - more resources