Legislation and policy for involuntary mental healthcare across countries in the FOSTREN network: rationale, development of mapping survey and protocol
- PMID: 39295429
- PMCID: PMC11457212
- DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2024.744
Legislation and policy for involuntary mental healthcare across countries in the FOSTREN network: rationale, development of mapping survey and protocol
Abstract
Background: Several countries are currently revising or have already revised their mental health laws to align with the global movement to reduce the use of coercive care. No government has yet fully implemented the recommendation of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) to eliminate the use of coercion in mental healthcare. Consequently, the international field of mental health law and policy is in a degree of flux.
Aims: To describe the rationale, development and protocol for a project that will map and examine how mental health laws, policies and service capacity across European countries relate to the use of coercive measures, including involuntary admissions and treatment, restraints and seclusion. This will help to better understand the current situation and explore future directions of policies regarding coercive care.
Method: The project is being carried out under the purview of the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) action network, entitled FOSTREN (Fostering and Strengthening Approaches to Reducing Coercion in European Mental Health Services). A multidisciplinary group of experts developed a comprehensive survey assessing mental health laws, policies and service frameworks, based on World Health Organization and UNCRPD recommendations. The survey was piloted in three countries, revised and disseminated to 30 FOSTREN country representatives. The survey will provide data for three strands of work on legislation, policies and service-level context. A comprehensive evaluation will be conducted, drawing on findings from all work packages.
Conclusions: The project could inform the development of strategies, interventions and legislation to address gaps and promote compliance with international standards.
Keywords: Coercion; Europe; United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; mental health legislation; policies.
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Similar articles
-
Expert opinions on improving coercion data collection across Europe: a concept mapping study.Front Psychiatry. 2024 May 29;15:1403094. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1403094. eCollection 2024. Front Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 38868490 Free PMC article.
-
Nigeria's mental health and substance abuse bill 2019: Analysis of its compliance with the United Nations convention on the rights of persons with disabilities.Int J Law Psychiatry. 2022 Jul-Aug;83:101817. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2022.101817. Epub 2022 Jun 27. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2022. PMID: 35772283
-
How Did Governments Address the Needs of People With Disabilities During the COVID-19 Pandemic? An Analysis of 14 Countries' Policies Based on the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities.Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7111. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7111. Epub 2023 May 17. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023. PMID: 37579394 Free PMC article.
-
Legal and Regulatory Approaches to Rehabilitation Planning: A Concise Overview of Current Laws and Policies Addressing Access to Rehabilitation in Five European Countries.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 18;17(12):4363. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124363. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32570746 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Reducing coercion in mental healthcare.Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 Dec;28(6):605-612. doi: 10.1017/S2045796019000350. Epub 2019 Jul 9. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019. PMID: 31284895 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Staff Attitude Towards Coercive Measures in Hospital and Community Psychiatric Settings.J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 22;14(9):2886. doi: 10.3390/jcm14092886. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40363919 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Beauchamp T, Childress J. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 5th ed. 2001.
-
- Gattellari M, Butow PN, Tattersall MHN. Sharing decisions in cancer care. Soc Sci Med 2001; 52(12): 1865–78. - PubMed
-
- Birkeland S, Bismark M, Barry MJ, Möller S. Is greater patient involvement associated with higher satisfaction? Experimental evidence from a vignette survey. BMJ Qual Saf 2022; 31(2): 86–93. - PubMed
-
- UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. The right to the highest attainable standard of health (article 12 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights). UN, 2000. (https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/425041?ln=en&v=pdf [cited 31 Jan 2024]).
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources