Development of Psoriasis Assessment Tools Among Patients in the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry
- PMID: 39296674
- PMCID: PMC11361488
- DOI: 10.1177/24755303231155118
Development of Psoriasis Assessment Tools Among Patients in the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry
Abstract
Background: Dermatologists would benefit from an easy to use psoriasis severity assessment tool in the clinic.
Objective: To develop psoriasis assessment tools to predict PASI and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) using simple measures typically collected in clinical practice.
Methods: Data included 33 605 dermatology visits among plaque psoriasis patients enrolled in the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry (4/15/15-7/11/20). Performance (adjusted coefficient of determination [R2 adj], root mean square error [RMSE]) in predicting PASI and DLQI was assessed for 16 different linear regression models (specified a priori based on combinations of BSA, Investigator's Global Assessment [IGA], itch, skin pain, patient global assessment, age, sex, BMI, comorbidity index, prior biologic use), and 2 stepwise selection models and 1 elastic net model based on 56 available variables. For each prediction model, concordance (sensitivity, specificity) of predicted PASI75, PASI90 and DLQI 0/1 with observed values was evaluated.
Results: Mean (SD) age, BSA, and PASI were 51 (14) years, 6 (11), and 4 (6), respectively; 46% were women, and 87% were biologic experienced. A model predicting PASI using BSA plus IGA performed best among a priori specified models (R2 adj = .72, RMSE = 2.93) and only marginally worse than models including additional variables (R2 adj range .64-.74, RMSE range 2.82-3.36). Models including IGA had the best concordance between predicted and observed PASI75 (sensitivity range 83-85%, specificity range 88-91%) and PASI90 (sensitivity range 76-82%, specificity range 94-98%). DLQI prediction was limited.
Conclusion: An assessment tool for psoriasis including BSA and IGA may be an ideal option to predict PASI in a clinic setting.
Keywords: DLQI; PASI; patient-reported outcome measures; psoriasis; psoriasis assessment tool.
© The Author(s) 2023.
Conflict of interest statement
The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: WG-Grants/research support: AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer. Honoraria for Ad Boards/Invited Talks/Consultation: AbbVie, Actelion, Amgen, Arylide, Bausch Health, Boehringer, Celgene, Cipher, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Merck, Novartis, PeerVoice, Pfizer, Sanofi-Genzyme, Tribute, UCB, Valeant. Other: Clinical trials (study fees): AbbVie, Asana Biosciences, Astellas, Boerhinger-Ingleheim, Celgene, CorEvitas/National Psoriasis Foundation, Devonian, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Galderma, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, UCB; KS, BZ, BK, RB-Employee/Stock, Eli Lilly and Company; RWH, RRM, SJK (former), Employee of CorEvitas, LLC (formerly Corrona, LLC); CL-Consultant/Advisory Board for Abbvie, Amgen, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Dermira, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Leo, Pfizer, Sandoz, UCB and Vitae, Investigator for Actavis, Abbvie, Allergan, Amgen, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, Coherus, Cellceutix, CorEvitas, Dermira, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Glenmark, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Novella, Pfizer, Sandoz, Sienna, Stiefel, UCB and Wyeth, Speaker bureau for Abbvie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Ortho Dermatologics, Sun Pharmaceuticals, and UCB.
Figures
References
-
- Duffin KC, Papp KA, Bagel J, Levi E, Chen R, Gottlieb AB. Evaluation of the physician global assessment and body surface area composite tool for assessing psoriasis response to apremilast therapy: Results from ESTEEM 1 and ESTEEM 2. J Drugs Dermatol. 2017;16(2):147-153. - PubMed
-
- Psoriasis: Assessment and Management of Psoriasis. London. 2012.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous