Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2024 Sep 20;35(4-5):315-321.
doi: 10.1515/jbcpp-2024-0142. eCollection 2024 Jul 1.

Ureteral access sheaths in RIRS: a retrospective, comparative, single-center study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Ureteral access sheaths in RIRS: a retrospective, comparative, single-center study

Giuseppe Celentano et al. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. .

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the use of ureteral access sheaths (UAS) in reducing operative time and complications, as well as improving stone-free rates (SFR), while assessing their overall safety and efficiency.

Methods: Data regarding 234 patients who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for stones up to 3 cm between January 2017 and March 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. About 52.5 % of procedures were performed utilizing a UAS. Differences in operative time, fluoroscopy time, stone-free rate, and complications were analyzed between procedures with and without UAS and stratified, according to stone burden size, into three groups (Group A: 0.5-1 cm; Group B: 1-2 cm; Group C: 2-3 cm).

Results: Operative time, fluoroscopy time, and residual fragments size were lower in RIRS without UAS, respectively, 54.27 ± 24.02 vs. 62.23 ± 22.66 min (p=0.010), 2.72 ± 0.89 vs. 4.44 ± 1.67 min (p<0.0001), and 3.85 ± 0.813 vs. 4.60 ± 0.83 mm (p=0.011). Considering stone burden, operative time was lower in RIRS without UAS for Group A (36.40 ± 8.555 vs. 46.05 ± 6.332 min) (p<0.0001) while higher for Group B (60.39 ± 18.785 vs. 50.14 ± 5.812 min) (p=0.002). Similarly, fluoroscopy time was lower in RIRS without UAS in every group, respectively, 2.11 ± 0.34 vs. 2.74 ± 0.57 min (p<0.0001), 2.94 ± 0.51 vs. 4.72 ± 0.37 min (p<0.0001), and 3.78 ± 1.26 vs. 6.79 ± 1.17 min (p<0.0001). Only Group C had a statistically significant difference in residual fragment size without UAS (3.89 ± 0.782 vs. 4.75 ± 0.886 mm) (p=0.050).

Conclusions: UAS should be carefully evaluated considering the increased fluoroscopy time and the differences in operative time related to different stone burdens.

Keywords: RIRS; stone-free rate; ureteral access sheath.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Barone, B, Crocetto, F, Vitale, R, Di Domenico, D, Caputo, V, Romano, F, et al.. Retrograde intra renal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones >2 cm. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Urol Nefrol 2020;72:441–50. https://doi.org/10.23736/s0393-2249.20.03721-2 . - DOI
    1. Zhang, W, Zhou, T, Wu, T, Gao, X, Peng, Y, Xu, C, et al.. Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for treatment of lower Pole renal stones: a meta-analysis and systematic review. J Endourol 2015;29:745–59. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2014.0799 . - DOI
    1. Zheng, C, Xiong, B, Wang, H, Luo, J, Zhang, C, Wei, W, et al.. Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of renal stones >2 cm: a meta-analysis. Urol Int 2014;93:417–24. https://doi.org/10.1159/000363509 . - DOI
    1. Inoue, T, Okada, S, Hamamoto, S, Fujisawa, M. Retrograde intrarenal surgery: past, present, and future. Investig Clin Urol 2021;62:121–35. https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.20200526 . - DOI
    1. Tzelves, L, Türk, C, Skolarikos, A. European association of urology urolithiasis guidelines: where are we going? Eur Urol Focus 2021;7:34–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2020.09.011 . - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources