Molecular responses of seaweeds to biotic interactions: A systematic review
- PMID: 39298370
- DOI: 10.1111/jpy.13504
Molecular responses of seaweeds to biotic interactions: A systematic review
Abstract
Seaweed farming is the single largest aquaculture commodity with >30 million tonnes produced each year. Furthermore, the restoration of lost seaweed forests is gaining significant momentum, particularly for kelps in warming temperate areas. Whether in aquaculture settings, following restoration practices, or in the wild, all seaweeds undergo biotic interactions with a diverse range of co-occurring or cocultured organisms. To date, most research assessing such biotic interactions has focused on the response of the organism interacting with seaweeds, rather than on the seaweeds themselves. However, understanding how seaweeds respond to other organisms, particularly on a molecular scale, is crucial for optimizing outcomes of seaweed farming or restoration efforts and, potentially, also for the conservation of natural populations. In this systematic review, we assessed the molecular processes that seaweeds undergo during biotic interactions and propose priority areas for future research. Despite some insights into the response of seaweeds to biotic interactions, this review specifically highlights a lack of characterization of biomolecules involved in the response to chemical cues derived from interacting organisms (four studies in the last 20 years) and a predominant use of laboratory-based experiments conducted under controlled conditions. Additionally, this review reveals that studies targeting metabolites (70%) are more common than those examining the role of genes (22%) and proteins (8%). To effectively inform seaweed aquaculture efforts, it will be crucial to conduct larger scale experiments simulating natural environments. Also, employing a holistic approach targeting genes and proteins would be beneficial to complement the relatively well-established role of metabolites.
Keywords: gene; interaction; macroalga; metabolite; protein.
© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Phycology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Phycological Society of America.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Abdelmigid, H. M., & Morsi, M. M. (2017). Cytotoxic and molecular impacts of allelopathic effects of leaf residues of Eucalyptus globulus on soybean (Glycine max). Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, 15, 297–302.
-
- Agbulu, V., Zaman, R., Ishangulyyeva, G., Cahill, J. F., & Erbilgin, N. (2022). Host defense metabolites alter the interactions between a bark beetle and its symbiotic fungi. Microbial Ecology, 84, 834–843.
-
- Aguiar‐Pulido, V., Huang, W., Suarez‐Ulloa, V., Cickovski, T., Mathee, K., & Narasimhan, G. (2016). Metagenomics, metatranscriptomics, and metabolomics approaches for microbiome analysis. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online, 12, 5–16.
-
- Aina, O., Bakare, O. O., Fadaka, A. O., Keyster, M., & Klein, A. (2024). Plant biomarkers as early detection tools in stress management in food crops: A review. Planta, 259, 60.
-
- Ali, O., Ramsubhag, A., & Jayaraman, J. (2021). Biostimulant properties of seaweed extracts in plants: Implications towards sustainable crop production. Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 10, 531.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
