Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 19:11:e58493.
doi: 10.2196/58493.

Regulating AI in Mental Health: Ethics of Care Perspective

Affiliations

Regulating AI in Mental Health: Ethics of Care Perspective

Tamar Tavory. JMIR Ment Health. .

Abstract

This article contends that the responsible artificial intelligence (AI) approach-which is the dominant ethics approach ruling most regulatory and ethical guidance-falls short because it overlooks the impact of AI on human relationships. Focusing only on responsible AI principles reinforces a narrow concept of accountability and responsibility of companies developing AI. This article proposes that applying the ethics of care approach to AI regulation can offer a more comprehensive regulatory and ethical framework that addresses AI's impact on human relationships. This dual approach is essential for the effective regulation of AI in the domain of mental health care. The article delves into the emergence of the new "therapeutic" area facilitated by AI-based bots, which operate without a therapist. The article highlights the difficulties involved, mainly the absence of a defined duty of care toward users, and shows how implementing ethics of care can establish clear responsibilities for developers. It also sheds light on the potential for emotional manipulation and the risks involved. In conclusion, the article proposes a series of considerations grounded in the ethics of care for the developmental process of AI-powered therapeutic tools.

Keywords: AI; European Artificial Intelligence Act; artificial intelligence; chatbot; chatbots; conversational agent; conversational agents; ethic; ethical; ethics; ethics of care; framework; frameworks; law; legal; mental health; mental healthcare; regulation; regulations; regulatory; relationship; relationships.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared

References

    1. Koutsouleris N, Hauser TU, Skvortsova V, de Choudhury M. From promise to practice: towards the realisation of AI-informed mental health care. Lancet Digit Health. 2022;4(11):e829–e840. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00153-4. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2589-7500(22)00153-4 S2589-7500(22)00153-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee EE, Torous J, de Choudhury M, Depp CA, Graham SA, Kim H, Paulus MP, Krystal JH, Jeste DV. Artificial intelligence for mental health care: clinical applications, barriers, facilitators, and artificial wisdom. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2021;6(9):856–864. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2021.02.001. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/33571718 S2451-9022(21)00046-X - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tal A, Elyoseph Z, Haber Y, Angert T, Gur T, Simon T, Asman O. The artificial third: utilizing ChatGPT in mental health. Am J Bioeth. 2023;23(10):74–77. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2250297. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mental health needs have multiplied. support hasn't. until now. Woebot Health. [2024-08-14]. https://woebothealth.com .
    1. Li H, Zhang R, Lee Y, Kraut RE, Mohr DC. Systematic review and meta-analysis of AI-based conversational agents for promoting mental health and well-being. NPJ Digit Med. 2023;6(1):236. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00979-5. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00979-5.10.1038/s41746-023-00979-5 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources